Think about the days before the war, people wanted revenge because of what happend in 9/11. Do you think it was Iraq or Saudi Arabia we should have gone to war with? Please don't get angry but someone had to pay for what happend. Would you have rather thought that anybody could do this to us at any time they wanted. Be truthfull to yourself and answer if you can?
2007-02-26 12:00:11 · 10 answers · asked by lizziemoffles 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
We need to finish the mission or else all the lives lost were just in vain
2007-02-26 12:08:38 · answer #1 · answered by weezie 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This war is Bush's fault in as far as he is the figurehead for powerful and invisible vested interests that allowed this to happen. He was stupid enough to shill for them. Now as for WANTING REVENGE ? Perhaps SOME people wanted revenge, but against whom? Who were the perpetrators ? Where did they come from ? Why did they do it ? What is the truth about this event ? I am not some addled brained medieval villager taking up a club to go after the what evers...because some said to.
Yes this is the GOPs fault. Its a Republican war. Its what Bush is going to be remembered for ; getting us caught up in a forever war and led there by lies and false premises. SOMEONE HAD TO PAY for what happened ?????????? Who ? And how much? And for what ? If ANYONE had to pay, it should have been the Bush Administration. After all this happened on Bush's watch. Don't be a fool. We LET this happen.
I hope you are not the middle of the bell shaped curve.
It is frightening anyone could be so stupid.
2007-02-26 20:34:04 · answer #2 · answered by planksheer 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
the president of the united states IS a war mogul due to the reason that the bushes' OWNS war related business (e.g weapons, tanks, etc...) therefore, war is VERY profitable for them and they WILL pursuit ANYTHING that is related or a fire starter...
(hence, 9/11 - post kuwait)
also, the united states are LARGE oil consumers, so going out to war with countries that produces oils will be an added advantage.
the 9/11 issue is just to show how VULNERABLE u.s is prepared with outside invations... public speculated that is it a cover up and a smear campaign cos bush didn't give much thought to it when it happened that very day...
terrorist will be terrorist... regardless of country
do you think the u.s is the global s.w.a.t team?
if so, do you think that they have the right to kill?
if so, killing u.s citizens is alright since they are at wrong?
think again... it's not about religion, race or even land..
this is all about MONEY...
the propaganda is so huge, that it couldn't be comprehand at first glance...
fact : every government is dirty. find one that is clean and tell the world... if not, don't speculate and spread assumption..
2007-02-26 20:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by Arez 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Our government *ucked-up BIG TIME!
W and his cronies got thousands of young, US men and women killed for a cause that has nothing to do with weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, or democracy. And now we are left to contend with starting a religious civil war in Iraq.
The attack on Iraq was poorly planned, poorly conceived, and was a mistake from the get-go. The focus should have been on Bin-Laden and his organization the whole time.
God bless all the men and women in uniform. We may not like the orders we are given, but we are sworn to carry them out to the best of our abilities. We need COMPETENT LEADERSHIP in Washington!
2007-02-26 20:27:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
You need to watch a movie or two about how this lame excuse for a president knew about 9-11. The entire administration had prior knowledge & even helped plan the attacks & FARCE of
9-11 Don't trust a REPUBLICAN. They want to kill all or most of the citizens so they can rule the world & make billions at the expense of us innocent peasants.Time is running out on the U.S. citizens & our way of life.
2007-02-26 20:11:52 · answer #5 · answered by markredwing 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
So, Saddam wasn't at fault for not letting UN inspectors in? He showed he had WMD when he gassed the Kurds.
I believe we went into Iraq due to Osama's training camps - some were located in Iraq. We went into Iraq cause he wasn't giving access to UN inspectors. (even dems said diplomacy was not working). We went into Iraq because Saddam killed thousands of Kurds...
After 9/11, I'm sure they looked at all the countries who didn't like the US, and Iraq was the biggest problem. So - we went in.
President Bush is doing a great job - the other candidate would have been in the underground bunkers crying his eyes out and we'd have been attacked again.
2007-02-26 20:16:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Iraq had NOTHING to do with 911.
2007-02-26 21:53:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
As Commander-in-Chief, the ultimate resposibility for ANY war lies with him. Period.
2007-02-26 21:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by Tough Love 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think it is the muslim extremists fault we are at war right now.
2007-02-26 20:50:56 · answer #9 · answered by subvet004 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋
it is al-quaida's fault.
2007-02-26 20:37:59 · answer #10 · answered by patriot07 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋