Global Warming Worst Case Scenario?

Question

If pollution continues and we don't do anything about it and it becomes to late to the point of a snow ball effect, what's the highest water level rise we could see and what is the fastest rate?

Answer 1

Worst case scenario.

The melting of ice reduces the reflectivity of Earth and, along with other positive feedback mechanisms, speeds up global warming. Ocean currents undergo massive changes. In as little as 20 years we see:

Sea levels 1-5 feet higher, causing massive coastal flooding and hundreds of billions of dollars in property losses. Massive disruptions to agriculture. Rich nations spend additional hundreds of billions of dollars to cope, relocating crops and building massive new irrigation systems.

Poor countries can't afford that. Bangladesh, among others, has much agricultural land a few feet above sea level. In those countries millions die of starvation.

Disruptions of warming ocean currents totally trash agriculture in Europe by making the climate colder. Europe goes into an economic depression coping. That hurts our economy even more.

Worse than worst case. China refuses to cut its' emissions even though the problem is obvious. There's a war by desperate nations to make them stop. It goes nuclear.

Answer 2

Basically lets put it this way, in 100 years, we still may be living with all this new science and technology, but the planet won't be here, unless we drastically change our living habits! Water levels will rise due to the melting of the glaciers. In as close as 50 years, the state of Flroida, parts of California, a lot of central america, and the provinces of Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and Labrador will be underwater. I recommend watching "An Inconvenient Truth".

Answer 3

i got here across this be taught to be an enticing progression, and a very well timed one thinking we are contained in the run as much as Copenhagen. From a political standpoint, i think of it incredibly is smart in that it incredibly is utilized to enhance the eco-friendly political time table, partly by means of acceptance of the Met workplace as a depended on clinical employer, even nonetheless it incredibly is considered as a splash too well timed thinking Copenhagen, that could reason some to question it incredibly is reliability. the result's certainly on the better end of predictions; distinctive learn have envisioned a achievable 4C upward thrust by using 2c4ca4238a0b92382dcc509a6f75849b00 [one million]. i'm conscious that the Met workplace has at the instant gained get right of entry to to lots more suitable climate fashions that could make their parent extra stable, nonetheless i don't be attentive to the considerable factors of that. As a worst case state of affairs that's achievable so some distance as i'm conscious. In precis, its a reliable component that the be taught has been produced. EDIT: in accordance with examining the various different answer's comments, I agree that that's strangely well timed, yet, so long by means of fact the be taught has been peer reviewed scientifically, i do no longer probable keep on with the argument that that's merely hype.

Answer 4

Global warming will ultimately result in a global winter... an ice age.

Increased average earth temperatures will result in increased evaporation ----> increased cloud cover-----> blocking insolation (incoming solar radiation)....

How high will the sea get first?... no one knows really..... how long will it take?... no one knows really. have humans had a significant impact?... no one knows.. if so, is it reversible?... no one knows.

Answer 5

the worst case scenario is belief that it exists,and that man has caused it, anyone who has gone through anything realizes that we are ultimatly powerless to change the world,if anything as well documented,we do more damage with good intentions

Answer 6

im sure youve heard this, but al gores movie "an inconvienant truth" (spelling?) is really interesting. as for your question, i dont know, but its not looking too good.