I don't know what you're asking, but I'll give it a shot.
To the first one, I have no idea what your asking.
To the second one, there will always be deaths in war, live with it
To the third one, U.S. forces are the target because they want us to leave. They want us to leave so they can kill each other.
80% of the population want us out of there because we are imposing christian values on a muslim world, and that obviously won't work. The Iraqi people have grown accustomed to danger and just don't care anymore. The fact that we are there doesn't mean anything. Also, most of the people over there don't realize that our being there is possibly the only thing stopping large scale civil war
2007-02-26 10:30:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alex H 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Whereas it would NOT require "hundreds of thousands of additional troops" and a draft is not/would not be necessary and,
Whereas statistically the majority of servicemen and women are Republican (at least that is what the "experts" say every four years) and,
Whereas US forces have ALWAYS been ONE target of the insurgency, though the murdering idiots prefer targeting innnocent civilians (including too many women and children) and,
Whereas the same polls also show that the same 80% who want the US forces out don't want them out until security has been established and,
Whereas the 45% of the Iraqi people in the poll you quote who feel that attacks on the US forces are justified are more than likely made up of many of the insurgents who are targeting those forces and,
Whereas the Iraqi people DO care or they would not have an opinion to express in those polls you quote . . . .
THEREFORE it is obvious you have no idea what you are talking about.
2007-02-26 18:38:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by John B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I can see you have been drinking to much kool-aide! Whereas, morons like you write this dribble much less believe in it. The more you say it the more you believe it?
Whereas stabilization is being left up to the Iraq forces, that's what the Demo's want, that's what the military is doing. Whereas, 3,159 US troops have died in Operation Iraqi Freedom, which all in all for a war of 4 years isn't to bad, considering we lost 7,000 Marines and 30,000 Japanese in 30 days at Iwo Jima, Whereas US forces have always been a target of the insurgency, and nice of you by the way to admit that is is insurgencies, Whereas I think it's 100% of the Iraqi people want us out of there, i would too, it's there country, BUT Whereas, 100% of the Iraqi people no that their government and forces are not ready to take over yet, but its coming, Whereas, unless you have served you have no clue as to what you are talking about, but then again look who it's coming from!
2007-02-26 18:29:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Its only true because you probably refuse to look at he other side of the coin. Where were the polls taken? 55% obviously dont think that the attacks are justified. The military is a weapon used for war, of course they are going to be the target of the insurgency. As far as republicans not joining the military, the republican enlisted personnel out number the democrats 3-2, republican officer corp outnumbers democrat officers by 8-1. Taken directly from voter turn out from the Washington Monthly. So you see if you only want to see what you want to see then it will be the truth and no one will change your mind. A link to support republican military. http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/2004/10/the_military_vote
2007-02-26 18:31:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry, do you have a question? It's true because there's documented evidence of that many troop deaths...because there are some polls (although it's not clear here how accurate, extensive, or scientific those polls were) that state certain numerical expressions of Iraqi opinion....The first paragraph is a hypothesis, not really a statement of fact, and I assume the "target of the insurgency" is backed up by common experience of U.S. troops.
2007-02-26 18:24:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by Qwyrx 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
LMFAO....hundreds of thousands???? ok i get it..this is a pelosi party joke right??? wow thats a good one Republicans wont join...BWAAAH HAAAAH....ok theres no republicans in the army ...right???? AND WOWEE 3159 HAVE BEEN KILLED. and the iraqui people dont care...first of all NONE...of it is true. so there is no why...god where do we start...
whereas..thats probably the most literal thing ive heard a left wing extremist say in a while..ill give you credit for that.
additional stablization...sorry liberal..southern iraq is so stable the british contingent is being narrowed..thats what cheney was referring to..you lose on that.
hundreds of thousands and a military draft??? specifically bush has called for twenty thousand not hundreds of thousands and according to abc this was having a measurable effect on baghdad in domestic security as the forces are now arriving.
3159 troops...wow as much as i feel for the families..ALL the kurds were being ethnicly cleansed from the face of the earth by saddam when we stopped him...ever heard of auchwitz, dachau..same principle here. in other words , liberal..THEYD ALL BE DEAD...im sure they appreciate being alive
over 80 percent...what poll..and did they poll the kurds..i think not..again theyd all be dead.
45 percent feel justified...again, what poll and the iraquis didnt care..did that include the kurds??? did all those people who stood for hours at the polling places just do that for the photo op....theyll NEVER care when al qaeda is removed from their country...wow...im real curious what you wouldve felt about the liberation of nazi germanytoo...do you think the jews cared:????
one thing about liberal opinions and diapers...they are changed often and for similar reasons.
2007-02-26 18:46:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It shocks me to this day the US thought it could be the first ever welcomed occupation force in history .
You might hate the current President but the last thing on your wish list is a bunch of foreigners telling you to go to bed and walking around your streets with a gun .
There is no way that the US could have done anything but a regime change secure the infrastructure and walk away .
I as a Canadian (just imagine we had a real military budget and equipment and manpower and political will and a few other things) can't walk into the US and impose a British Parliamentary system of democracy and enforce it and expect happy Americans - And if I was the truly superior force you'd take pot shots at me - You'd want me out - at any cost - So you could decide your own nations future without the interference of an alien or a foreigner -
The Iraqi's might have hated Hussein - But it's their problem and you are a foreigner in their country walking around with a big gun
Surprise surprise your not a welcomed occupation force
2007-02-26 18:29:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
The only way America will be able to win a WAR in the future is to do it in ONE DAY, otherwise the American Media and libs will want them to withdraw OR the military could direct their WAR machine toward the libs and American Media, then we could all live happily ever after
2007-02-26 18:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by DukeofDixie 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
You will need a straight answer from the Commander in Chief on this one. Problem is, I don't think you will find a journalist, or average American, brave enough to do the asking for you.
2007-02-26 18:29:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by navymom 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Whereas, you should shut your tv off and stop listening to the liberal media. You sound like a parrot. Try conservative talk radio for a change.
2007-02-26 18:27:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋