...meat eaters who claim to not eat much meat at all...as if the numbers are something that should be considered in mitigation!
"...it was only five i killed, your honour..." !
2007-02-26 07:34:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment
You're a bit holier-than-thou, aren't you?
2007-02-26 07:39:11 · answer #1 · answered by bingba n 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Neither. a friend once worked for a forest service, and drove a big honking truck- because that was what was needed to work in the bloody forest.
Likewise, meat eaters are not all equal. People eating indigenous meats in Northern North America, for example, tend to have a smaller carbon footprint than their neghbors who eat meals high in soy and/or out of season produce.
2007-02-26 07:40:41 · answer #2 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I vote for the plant eaters who fail to recognize that plants are also alive.
2007-02-26 08:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by John S 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The most ridiculus are the ones that are concerned over these topics
2007-02-26 07:47:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its the Cows and the Sheep that are the biggest gas emitters on the globe. That's why we eat them. If we don't we will all be smothered by poison gas. Pass the ribs please!
2007-02-26 07:43:27 · answer #5 · answered by K. Marx iii 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The most ridiculous are the hippie sh*theads who ask stupid f*cking questions to promote their annoying political agendas.
2007-02-26 07:43:52 · answer #6 · answered by Angry-T 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i'd say the environmentalists who drive SUV's
2007-02-26 07:42:33 · answer #7 · answered by sangreal 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Right.... and your perfect how?
2007-02-26 07:47:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋