English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Actually there was no Gnostic Christians until after the second word was coined, which was, of course, after the time of Jesus. Before that, we were just Gnostics or Essenes. This was the group of people that Jesus belonged to. We simply believe in reincarnation, in an all-loving and fair God, and to the Mother God principle. We study where we are going and why we are here.

Most other churches built big buildings and begged everybody for money. The Gnostics wanted to be, and still are, a group of people that choose to love and experience God without the pomp and circumstance.

A Gnostic does not believe without research and validation. See for yourself, look up the Nag Hammadi writings of the Essenes. The writers of those words saw the bible as a metaphor that teaches the greatness of God.

The Gnotic writings were stymied by the "Pauline" Christians because the Gnostics did not encourage fear and control.

2007-02-26 06:17:53 · 9 answers · asked by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

I find it really very amusing how christians butt in to say that her version of christianity is wrong. Even accusing her of failing history (ironic since if most christians knew actual history they would never believe in their silly myths).

I imagine the asker would know more about her own religion than an inaccurate source such as wikipedia or a biased christian website. And I think it's nice to see there are sects that view the bible as the metaphorical, symbolic literature that it is.

2007-02-26 06:36:08 · answer #1 · answered by Mike K 5 · 1 1

The Gnostic gospels are writings by early "Christian" Gnostics. After the first century of Christianity, two primary divisions developed - the orthodox and the Gnostics. The orthodox Christians held to books we now have in the Bible and to what is today considered orthodox theology. The Gnostic Christians, if they can truly be described as Christians, held a distinctly different view of the Bible, of Jesus Christ, of salvation - and virtually every other major Christian doctrine. However, they did not have any writings by the apostles to give legitimacy to their beliefs.



That is why and how the Gnostic gospels were created. The Gnostics fraudulently attached the names of famous Christians to their writings, such as the gospel of Thomas, the gospel of Philip, the gospel of Mary, etc. The discovery of the Nag Hammadi library in northern Egypt in 1945 represented a major discovery of Gnostic gospels. These Gnostic gospels are often pointed to as supposed "lost books of the Bible."



So, what are we to make of the Gnostic gospels? Should some or all of them be in the Bible? No, they should not. First, as we pointed out above, the Gnostic gospels are forgeries. The Gnostic gospels were fraudulently written in the names of the apostles in order to give them a legitimacy in the early church. Thankfully, the early church fathers were nearly unanimous in recognizing the Gnostic gospels as promoting false teachings about virtually every key Christian doctrine. There are countless contradictions between the Gnostic gospels and the true Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The Gnostic gospels can be a good source to study early Christian heresies, but they should be rejected outright as not belonging in the Bible and not representing the genuine Christian faith.

2007-02-26 06:52:54 · answer #2 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0 1

Gnosticism (from Greek gnosis, knowledge) is a term created by modern scholars to describe a diverse religious movement often associated with Christianity, although textual evidence for the movement contains distinctly non- and anti-Christian elements, as well as anti-Judaic elements. These beliefs had largely syncretistic origins in that they were often based on various influences from such idea systems.

Several Gnostic texts appear to have no Christian element at all. Because the textual evidence comes from the first few centuries AD, many scholars have assumed that Gnosticism did not predate this period, but earlier historians of religion saw it as an outgrowth of ancient mystical traditions in Asia, especially Iran.

2007-02-26 06:23:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Many different forms of Christianity developed after Christ's crucifixion. The early Church suppressed them all not just the Gnostic beliefs and declared their writings and adherents heretical. The Church even went so far as to falsely accuse the other sects of every sexual perversion they could think of. The Gnostics, however, were seen as one of the biggest threats within the early Church.

2007-02-26 06:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Are you familiar with the Gnostic ideals. it extremely is a like a completely distinctive faith. it is not even related to the Jewish scripts got here upon interior the previous testomony. besides, there can not be an "definitely" reappearance of Gnosticism, on account that maximum of what they believed in and the texts they used have not survived to us and the languages that they spoke are no longer completely understood. Yeah, i comprehend they might translate a number of it, in spite of the undeniable fact that it's not the comparable. Idioms and languages substitute over an prolonged time, no longer to show hundreds of years. the hot Gnostic communities are many distinctive communities, a number of whom are in basic terms rereading various the texts and using their suggestions, others are people who desire to confirm mystical books for the exciting of it, or they may well be attempting to earnings some insights. the two way, there's no possible way of even understanding precisely what they believed in. in fact, there's no reason to have self assurance that it grow to be in basic terms Gnosticism and Early Christianity (what may well be Catholic/Orthodox church homes), I propose there might have been greater gospels and much greater varieties of Christianity, and in fact there have been. some might by no potential be extensive-unfold to us, and others all of us comprehend little or no approximately. we are able to discover out approximately Gnosticism 'reason there're manuscripts left and there's a wikipedia internet site approximately it. What with reference to the ideals that have not have been given surviving manuscripts? Even Gnostic Christianity is unknown to us completely. we are able to in basic terms see glimpses of it, which isn't adequate to declare we comprehend what they have been questioning.

2016-11-26 00:29:18 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

central to gnostic teachings are:

a "secret knowledge" some have, and others did not - the core of that teaching is found in the gnostic reality that no one can ever know god - that the god we think we see is truly not the real god - in that, only those who have a special knowledge can truly know who this god is.

flesh is evil, and spirit is pure. because in flesh we can never truly know god - in any form. this is due to the fall of humanity, a key teaching in gnostic teaching. this is way to dualistic for me, it is too "black and white."

may i suggest reading about simon magus and the mythology that formed around him - cool stuff

while there are more, those two point to the reality that no one can ever truly "know" anything about the gnostic understanding of god. given that, all that can be recieved from the gnostic texts is that humanity is evil and god is unknowable.

2007-02-26 06:47:39 · answer #6 · answered by John O'Keefe 3 · 1 0

Actually, gnostic writings were stymied by the apostles, because they did not match what Jesus taught.

The gnostic philosophy comes from Greek philosophy, and did not originate with Jesus, a Jew. Gnosticism is older than Christianity, so it cannot be a form of Christianity.

2007-02-26 06:22:36 · answer #7 · answered by Randy G 7 · 3 3

You receive a F FAILURE

F in history
F in Gnosticism
F in Jesus and the Gnostic's
F in the Gnostic's and Paul

2007-02-26 06:25:31 · answer #8 · answered by williamzo 5 · 1 5

Funny - as a Christian, I've never felt fear, nor felt controlled.

2007-02-26 06:23:12 · answer #9 · answered by SpiritRoaming 7 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers