English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a bill proposal I am currently working on that would give any military personnel (18-20yr.) the rights of any U.S. citizen of the age 21+. These rights would include:
1. The right to legally carry a concealed personal firearm off base.
2. The right to go to clubs
3. The right to go to casinos
4. The right to drink.

Some people believe that U.S. Military personnel already have these rights, however that is not true. In the 1960's MADD passed a bill stating that all military bases must "follow the law of the land". Therefore you can’t drink under the age of 21. Also only in a few states at the age of 21 are you allowed to carry a concealed firearm at age 21. And since most clubs and casinos serve alcohol anyone under 21 is not allowed in. I believe that the people fighting for our rights deserve our rights. Please give me your input on my "proposal” I already have a local House of Representative behind me, however I need to get a few more before a bill will be written

2007-02-26 03:04:41 · 11 answers · asked by willfrom_az 1 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

Can you describe the magical change that occurs to make an 18 year old in the military able to handle alcohol responsibly?

I have been a first sergeant. 'Alcohol related incidents' were a major headache.

2007-02-26 08:09:26 · answer #1 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

UInfortunately, even those who join the military are just as immature and irresponsible as those who remain dope-smoking hippies. Your bill, while generous, will only serve to get more soldiers in trouble over the long run.

In certain areas they do allow underage drinking on post to help control alcohol related incidents. For example, Ft. Bliss, Texas, allows drinking on post with a military ID, because they are a ten dollar cab ride from Juarez, Mexico, and they are tired of drunken soldiers going across the border and creating an international incident. Doesn't help, because the base can't compete pricewise, and it's a real sausage-fest, but at least they are willing to offer an alternative.

2007-02-26 11:32:40 · answer #2 · answered by Curtis B 6 · 0 0

That sounds like a great idea. I'm a military man myself. I wished I had that right at the time. How can I be allowed to joined the military right after High School, deploy for 6-9 months out of the year and not be able to come home and enjoy a nice cold beer with my dad. Or take a little trip to Vegas and hit the casinos with my parents. Good luck with the proposal.

2007-02-26 11:12:28 · answer #3 · answered by Chi-Townz Finezt 2 · 1 1

I'm all for it.

BTW, MADD can't pass a bill; but unfortunately, they seem to have WAY too much political influence. Some drunk driver needs to plow into their headquarters. That would be some hilarious irony.


Regarding Curtis B's comments: I was a career USAF officer. While military members are certainly not immune to juvenile indiscretion, I would disagree that they are not significantly more mature than their civilian peers. The fact that they enlisted to serve their country is already a sign of maturity. Hopefully, the discipline they've received in military training and a structured life make them even more so.

2007-02-26 11:12:11 · answer #4 · answered by Rob D 5 · 2 2

Yes, why shouldn't we be. We're old enough to die for our country and for the freedom that every individual has. Why if you are old enough to die for your country, to put more on the line then 1/2 the people in the states, why shouldn't we be allowed a few more privellages? It's not like we're saying we should get to be president at 18. I think that 2-4 should be allowed to us. i'm alittle unsure about the first one, but we do carry them for a year straight with no problem.

2007-02-26 11:12:14 · answer #5 · answered by Amber 1 · 1 1

I agree....If you are on active duty, your Military ID should off set the 21 age limit. I also see no reason why an active duty person, shouldn't carry a weapon. I carried a 45 while on duty, yet couldn't carry in town, unless I was in uniform and on duty. Kind of a double standard.
As for the casinos and clubs....Im for it. We always had good clubs on base with lots of booze, bands and bused in ladies

2007-02-26 11:29:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

There should be a clause to the bill that they have to be active duty! Otherwise, weekend warriors that only serve once a month and 2 weeks in summer will get in trouble. (My son is currently a weekend warrior at age 20, he is going active in Army soon). I agree with the clause for active duty soldiers only!

2007-02-26 11:50:01 · answer #7 · answered by gigglings 7 · 0 1

It is a good idea, but be prepared for road blocks, I can see the "can of worms" argument that would be brought.
"If one person can do it, why can't every 18 year old?"

2007-02-26 11:20:10 · answer #8 · answered by kittenbrower 5 · 1 0

Nope. The law of the land rules.

2007-02-26 11:12:42 · answer #9 · answered by snvffy 7 · 1 1

No. A soldier(Sergeant , Squad Leader ,etc.) must take his duty seriously. I think what all this "rights" but first must be not allowed to soliders.Don't take it wrong.

2007-02-26 11:19:13 · answer #10 · answered by Jora N. Korner 2 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers