English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

DOKES WOULD HAVE WON IN 3RD MAJORITY DECISION.


P. S. WHY SETTLE FOR A FAKE WHEN THE REAL THING IS BACK.

2007-03-01 22:00:11 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 0 0

That is funny in 1976 Stevenson was at the top of his game he would have killed Dokes and I like him a lot I use to box on some of the same cards as Dokes when we were armatures in Ohio

2007-02-26 10:53:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope, Teofilio Stevenson would have still been Stevenson, and on a bad day would have handled Dokes with ease. Stevenson may have been the greatest to never win the title.

2007-02-27 00:32:25 · answer #3 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0 0

There would have been no chance for dokes Teofilio was totally in a class of his own. Micheal would have lost the fight. Only way Mike could of won is if Teofililo stayed in Cuba.

2007-02-28 21:33:19 · answer #4 · answered by idak13 4 · 0 0

No. Stevenson was in the class of the best ever in this arena.

2007-02-26 10:05:39 · answer #5 · answered by gman 6 · 1 1

no, stevenson was best between 72-84. no one could beat him but holmes,ali(72-75) foreman.

2007-02-28 16:41:11 · answer #6 · answered by mike c 3 · 0 0

No he would have lost anyway.

2007-02-26 10:08:27 · answer #7 · answered by SoccerClipCincy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers