I've heard this before and I don't believe it.
I've tested it a few times and it's generally true, but the variation in the difference between hand/foot sizes and hoo ha sizes is about the same as the variation in hand/foot sizes from one bloke to another, as far as I can tell.
In extreme examples, it doesn't hold up at all. I think that the average sizes of a men's hands, feet and winkies just happen to be close enough that they give the illusion of a relationship.
2007-02-25 23:24:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was once stated it was the tip of the thumb to the tip of your index finger so if you make like a 'gun' shape with these fingers then you should get the 'size' but I doubt very much that it is true!
2007-02-25 23:23:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Weird One! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe you. increasing inflation is the basis rationalization why the Fed will advance fees of activity which ought to advance domicile values. contained in the eighty's whilst fees of activity skyrocketed and dollar became vulnerable no you may desire to have the money for to purchase a house which created a extra robust call for for condominium properties. a extra robust call for creates bigger rents which by using the years will produce bigger fees whilst those comparable properties are on the industry by means of bigger cap fees (that's genuine for the two commercial and domicile). i've got self belief the present shrink in domicile values contained in the north east became by means of a industry adjustment from fees merely being too inflated contained in the 1st place. yet as to the destiny you (and me) are suitable in our questioning. So, while you're finding to purchase funding belongings that's extra effective to devise on being a landlord for awhile incredibly than a house flipper.
2016-12-18 11:07:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hearing for 1st time. Too complex to understnd
2007-02-25 23:26:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by ramesh c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't believe it, men have what they have whether large or small, there is no way of telling unless you see with your own eyes!
2007-02-25 23:22:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gerry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
LMAO
No correlation whatsoever.
2007-02-25 23:20:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by kja63 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope its all in the genes.
2007-02-25 23:20:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by emmf98 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
BULL sh**.go look for logic...
2007-02-25 23:23:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by 2bros 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no connection at all... :D
2007-02-25 23:20:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Forlorn Hope - returned 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
lies, all lies. trust me, i've checked.
2007-02-25 23:28:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by amanda 4
·
1⤊
0⤋