2007-02-25 18:00:39 · 9 answers · asked by Contemplative Monkey 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
momoftwoboys: Yeah well. :)
2007-02-25 18:08:32 · update #1
Hey, you asked this just a day or two ago!
2007-02-25 18:05:44 · answer #1 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Since it was nearly four thousand years ago when it was not yet a genetic problem having children with a close relative, he wouldn't have to explain anything. It was only as time passed, and genetic abnormalities crept into the DNA code, due to human pollution and poor eating habits, that it became necessary to limit who was having children with whom. You're trying to compared apple to oranges. It was a completely different time and the only example of significant genetic abnormalities was the children of the fallen angles, the skulls of which may be what we now think are the skulls of missing links.
2007-02-25 19:36:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"nicely, those 2 childrens have been using of their BMW X5 (white) and that they have got been eating too lots. so as that they drifted into the different lane going the choice course. as they have been going the incorrect way, a semi hit them. thankfully they have been in an suv so as that they simply flew throughout the time of the windshield and over the semi. one landed on the part of the line collectively as th different landed on a pole( in case you already know what i propose) and los her virginity to an inanimate merchandise. Then, Manbearpig confirmed up and tried to take the different woman away. She resisted so manbear pig gave up. He employed a snake to return alongside, and, nicely, you may wager what got here approximately next. She lost her virginity to an prolonged, no longer undemanding, writhing East South American Anaconda. The anaconda died of herpes. Dont question me. and the girl went directly to be hillary clinton. the different woman grow to be caught to a poel for something of her existence. it extremely is how pole dancing grow to be invented.
2016-11-25 23:42:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on which route he wanted to go, the abusive druggie or the rapist pedophile.
1. It was the alcohol! I didn't know what I was doing.
Or
2. They seduced me. It's their fault.
You'll note these really are the excuses that modern day criminals would use. And these are also the same things (some) Christians use to excuse Lot's behavior.
2007-02-25 18:07:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, he could have tried to pass his two pregnant daughters off as virgins, each carrying the messiah. He might even have some believers adoring the children.
But if we are to believe the bible, these children are a result of incest, of his daughters having sex with their father. Great example of biblical family values.
2007-02-25 18:07:30 · answer #5 · answered by CC 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Just because the Bible describes an incident does NOT mean that God condoned that incident. You do know that, right? Oh wait, how can you, you're just a drink.
2007-02-25 18:06:08 · answer #6 · answered by Last Ent Wife (RCIA) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
These are my daughters, They did the best they could with the information they had.
2007-02-25 18:05:33 · answer #7 · answered by LadyCatherine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Man, I don rememba nothin. I wuz drunker than Cooter Brown!!
2007-02-25 18:05:11 · answer #8 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not good
2007-02-25 18:11:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋