English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My 36 year old boyfriend is moving to another state with his parents instead of staying here with me. (They all live in the same town right now) We've been together for 7 years, and now all of a sudden he wants to move with his parents clear across the US. Although he has always said that he doesn't like being around his parents, he wants to move with them. He has been saving ALL OF HIS MONEY for the move since September of '06 (which he gives to his mother on paydays, that has a savings account in her name for him). He hasn't given me a dime since Sept., and we live together! How would you feel if this was happening to you? I'm hurt and angry and I want him gone NOW since he's going anyway! I've asked him to leave and live with his parents since he's moving with them anyway, but he refuses. They are all moving in June, but I want him gone now! Should I feel this way?

2007-02-25 16:05:59 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Family

10 answers

sure its natural to feel this way
you should dump him
he is no good for you
you should be #1 on his list

2007-02-25 16:09:28 · answer #1 · answered by Inugurl3 4 · 0 0

It's very clear that he is done with you. The sad thing about it is you know when and how he will leave you. But if both of you are on the lease you need to tell the landlord he's not paying he's share of rent. If you don't have a lease, give your 30 day notice and get your own apartment. Don't you dare pay another dime for him to stay there, you can do better.

2007-02-25 16:20:22 · answer #2 · answered by mia w 5 · 0 0

Sure, you should feel angry. He's made his choice and still wants to hang around until he has a clear getaway. You should just move out, abruptly, don't even look behind you when you leave. Don't be in touch with him. You need all your strength to move on with your life. Why in the world live with the guy? Correct that situation right now.

2007-02-25 16:26:52 · answer #3 · answered by kathyw 7 · 1 0

you know, there replaced right into a regulation & Order episode that dealt with this topic - i imagine it truly is an older one - Chris Noth and Jerry Orbach were the detectives i imagine. sturdy episode. i imagine the state might want to be able to stress medical therapy - really even if it truly is a minor. i do no longer imagine it falls lower than the separation of church and state in any respect. To me, mum and dad that deny their children suitable medical therapy are being irresponsible. Now, no longer taking soreness drugs is one ingredient - in the experience that they don't opt for to take ibuprofen in the experience that they have got a headache, it truly is one ingredient. yet diabetes is a thoroughly distinct situation. you at the on the spot are not endangering your existence in case you do not take ibuprofen for a headache (besides the undeniable fact that you actually will be in some soreness). Untreated diabetes can actual be existence threatening as this situation shows. If the guy is a minor, i imagine the state might want to stress medical therapy. If the guy isn't a minor, and refuses therapy all alone behalf, then the state might want to no longer intrude. yet an 11 year previous lady is a minor, and she isn't allowed to make judgements for herself lower than the regulation, and if her mum and dad are being irresponsible, the state might want to step in, religious beliefs or no longer. i might want to also imagine that the mother and dad might want to certainly be held criminally to blame - they could be charged with criminally negligent homicide. in my opinion, i might want to fee them with that. i'm positive some will disagree with me, yet i'm of the perception that the sturdy Lord did not supply human beings the brains to come back up with remedies for ailments like diabetes and then assume us now to not use them. the girl's lack of existence is tragic, or perhaps extra so because it might want to have easily been prevented. might want to God keep her in His loving hands. Peace!

2016-10-17 09:06:13 · answer #4 · answered by nelems 4 · 0 0

y dont u move with him as well
and GOD,,,,,,,,,,, u living with him since 7 years and still didnt get married with him!!!!! amazing......

and by the way, parents have some rights on their kids. they also spent their money on their kids while they cant do anything on their own (in childhood). in our country kids support parents (when they started earning) not only finicially but morally as well.

just imagine ur own kid refuse to give u money if u need it. just think of the labour pain the mother feel while giving birth. so dont u think she has some right on his kids???

plz dont b so mean. (excuse me for my wordings)

my advise is to ....first get married with him, + move with him, its not a big deal. change is good for life. i m too moving to europe very very soon (insha Allah) since i got married with a guy there couple of months back, and i live in asia.

i can understand this, could b a sudden news for u, and resisitance to change is natural. but think will this resistance give u anything? will it bring comfort or not?

may Alllah (God) guide us towards the right path, ameen

2007-02-25 16:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It sounds like he is still attached to his mom's apron strings! If he can't stand living with his parents why move with them? Pack up his stuff and kick him the hell out! I bet he will change his mind really quick.
Good Luck! ♥

2007-02-25 16:10:55 · answer #6 · answered by Saucy Minx 2 · 0 0

I'd give him a baby bottle and tell him to go live with his mommy and daddy. I'd move him out myself, there would be no living here with me until June.

2007-02-25 16:09:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

you have every right to feel as you do, so pack his stuff and put
him out, since he want his parents then let them take care of
his sorry but. and i would also take hm to court to pay the rent
he own you for staying there. kick him to the curb like yesterday
why you playing.

2007-02-25 16:57:12 · answer #8 · answered by luckystar 6 · 1 0

yes you should. I think that by law you would be entitled to half of the money that he has got saved. Go and talk to a attroney and get the money if you can. HURRY.

2007-02-25 16:10:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If his name is not on the Lease, the police will remove him...and take him to Court for the Rent he should be paying to you...

2007-02-25 16:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers