English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ancient civilisations accepted them why don't we? As long as they are conscenting adults.

2007-02-25 13:32:33 · 31 answers · asked by toiletseat 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

31 answers

Why limit it to consenting adults? Animals don't. Aren't they our model for what is sexually acceptable?

2007-02-25 13:37:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

Humans and animals are not held to the same morality.

With such species the males have a natural desire to hump things because they become extremely horny during certain times of the year which are the masculine equivalent of heat for females. During this time the male relieves himself with a female if he is capable of succumbing a female to allow him to mate with her this often requires some form of rape. If he fails he may attempt to rape or hump anything even a male's anus but this in no way should be compared to the active choice of intercourse among humans.

Similarly females in heat are much the same, presenting themselves often with little strength to resist any form of sexual intercourse. Rarely a female will attempt to hump another female but is not actually intercourse and is an instinctive way in which the female attempts to relieve the one in heat of their discomfort due to the scent emitted by females in heat. It's very slightly comparable to a massage or a check-up by a gynecologist.

The key here is these males rape and the females are in some form of heat, the first being a clear immoral act for humans and the second not even pertaining to humans. So to label such acts as synonymous with homosexual intercourse among humans would not be correct.

Other such acts that would not make sense between animal and human behavior would be the way in which males fight over females, the way males often viciously attack the female, the fact that many such males do not care for the children and do not benefit the child's nurturing while human paternal interaction is beneficial, and that most animals with disorders causing homosexuality typically do not survive to maturity in environments with little or no disruption from man.

2007-02-25 14:06:47 · answer #2 · answered by Holy Holly 5 · 1 0

Homosexual acts is one thing....that is to say, same sex relationships between consenting adults is a choice that should be accepted without question. It is not just about sex! However, incest, in my opinion, can lead to too many evils, such as child abuse, and in breeding....which can cause all sorts of disabilities. Our intellect is what sets us apart from animals.

2007-02-25 16:04:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If human beings accompanied the bible we would all be ineffective. The bible says each and every thing is faulty and each little thing is nice. you in basic terms could desire to examine the main stunning area to discover what suites your needs. The bible talks approximately gay behaviour in some million/2 a dozen paragraph's. the rest is the two approximately human behaviour or heterosexuals and that i assure you heterosexual behaviour gets various interest on a similar time as certainly gays are all yet over appeared. Did you presently that the bible additionally says you may desire to no longer have intercourse with a females whos having her sessions. MMMmmm so how can that artwork??? In understand to God and nature. you may desire to separate organic behaviour from regulations. The bible is approximately regulations. the reason we in the gay community communicate approximately gay animal behaviour is for while human beings declare gay behaviour isn't organic. We then element out that if animals do it then it ought to be organic. by the form. the 2nd link. It would not point out, Bighorn Sheep. those are nicely worth looking into. curiously no longer in basic terms do those boys delight in a gay time, if one in all them wont play ball with the others he's rejected. If we've been to narrate this to be responsive to sexualities, the rejected sheep could be a heterosexual animal on a similar time as the others are the two gay or bisexual. This breed of animal is in simple terms living a existence sort opposite to what us human beings do as with us human beings, the rejected one is the gay human. EDIT: i could opt for to in basic terms element out the flaw in R C beginning up remark made above mine. sure some animals do consume their youthful and roll around in each and each others crap etc. We human beings have performed all of those issues. sure we are the the precise comparable. the reason its no longer take place plenty at present is the regulation that prevents us doing it. yet I assure you each and every and all of the failings listed have been performed by utilising human beings and nonetheless take place at present yet no longer extremely often.

2016-10-02 00:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by coriolan 4 · 0 0

also fish ,insects ,reptiles ,and all animals
in nature ,gay is as common as pie.
the sex drive beside survival is the strongest natural force
and species will be motivated to try and have sex in all directions ,even across the species ,this is the engine of evolution ,that searches for new breeds to combat the future and changing conditions

So how Christians can say its not natural ,boggles the mind ,obviously they have no knowledge of Nature.

evrybody accepted human animal behaviour except for the modern organized religions try to think of why this is ,and you will understand ,it all has to do with power

2007-02-25 13:42:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Homosexuality and incest do not belong in the same categories - homosexuality between consenting adults is nobody's business but their own, as is anyone's sex life. Incest, however, is illegal for both moral and biological reasons - all you need is the most basic understanding of genetics to realise why.

2007-02-25 13:43:11 · answer #6 · answered by f0xymoron 6 · 2 0

Because studies have shown that when you inbreed, the higher the chances are that the children born from it will have mental retardation.
With regards to homosexuality, I have no problem with it.

2007-02-25 14:17:32 · answer #7 · answered by Abby C 5 · 0 0

I get tired of all this animal homosexual talk and not one cited source! You know we have quite an array to go through to find what you might be alluding to.

I know of some ape species that does not mind who tickles their fancy but it is not homosexual, but all comers welcome. Since they are still around they must realize that homosexual behavior leads to extinction.

What ancient civilizations? Sodom? Gomorrah? Rome? Greece? Where are they now?

Why should Man, evolved as you say, take their lead from animals? I see birds fly and fish swim, but even I know I cannot do as they. Let them look on at Man and marvel at our abilities.

2007-02-25 13:54:40 · answer #8 · answered by crimthann69 6 · 2 2

I can understand and accept homosexuality, but incestual inbreeding in humans often causes genetic abnormalities in resulting children.

2007-02-25 13:39:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Who says we don't accept it in animals? They are animals after all...not human beings.

Animals do not have sex for the same reasons humans do. Animals often mount each other to show dominance...it has nothing to do with sex. Sex is only thought about during the time the female is in estrus. Then it's instinct...so trying to equate what appears to be animal homosexuality to human homosexuality just doesn't get it.

2007-02-25 13:39:49 · answer #10 · answered by Misty 7 · 0 3

inbred animals display behavioural and physical inadequacies so same as i wouldnt expose a pet to orange dust nothing to do with religion I dont have one

2007-02-25 15:12:35 · answer #11 · answered by nendlin 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers