All ignorant Atheists let Smart Atheists talk Okay?

Question

You ask who made god?
Well it lives outside of space and time and all that
mortal stuff okay?

Does everyone go to Hell if sin is bad?
No that's what Jesus is for.

ATHEISTS STOP INSULTING CHRISTIANS IT DOES NO GOOD!!!
CHRISTIANS LIKEWISE!!

Colonel: Neither is your answer so...REPORTED!!!

Answer 1

everyone has freedom of choice; not your job to tell others what and what not to do ; live a good life , your own ; how can you see the speck in your neighbor's eye when you can even see the log in your own.

Answer 2

You have confused me. You mention atheism:
"All ignorant Atheists let Smart Atheists talk Okay?"

but now you're talking about something that Atheists don't believe in:
"You ask who made god?
Well it lives outside of space and time and all that
mortal stuff okay?

Does everyone go to Hell if sin is bad?
No that's what Jesus is for."

And then you ask for peace in a rather harsh way:
"ATHEISTS STOP INSULTING CHRISTIANS IT DOES NO GOOD!!!
CHRISTIANS LIKEWISE!!"

What exactly is your message?

Answer 3

You are not an Atheist I know who you are.
Everyone that name stands for Intelligent Design
and he's been a troll here for quite some time.
Goes by another name...Yu Hamagi T. Constantly
posing as either an Atheist or Pagan.

Answer 4

To even use the word hell is a sign of a lack of common sense.

Answer 5

You say stop insulting, but yet you start the sentence out with IGNORANT ATHEISTS....that's what you call a hypocrite

Answer 6

So far you haven't demonstrated you get even the simple challenges of Atheists, who only ask you "who made god?" in reponse to a theist's claim that the cosmos required a creator. Theists do nothing to demonstrate that the cosmos requires a creator, but if they insist the cosmos cannot exist without a creator, then they commit a logical fallacy called, "special pleading" when they insist we make an exception to their rule for their god merely for the sake of their prejudice.

It is again special pleading when faced with their inability to provide quantitative and measureable proof of their specific god's existence to say, as theists have, "He is in the earth." But we dig and he isn't there. "He is on the mountain." But we climb the mountain and he isn't there. "He is in the clouds." But we pierce the clouds and he isn't there, and we depart the earth and still not there. Since we cannot see him, they say, "He's invisible." Since we cannot feel him, they say "He is intangible spirit." We cannot detect him with any sense or any instrumentation, so they say, "He exists outside time and space." They simply retreat from their inability to provide any validation of their claims by positing conditions for which there is no evidence wherein their god continues to hide from us. That seems odd for a god determined to burn us for eternity if we get the details he's hiding wrong. But then they claim, "He revealed the details through his prophets." For which they can also offer no proof, certainly none to seperate them from all the prophets they call false for the sake yet again of their prejudice, not because they can prove the prophets they reject to be false. So we have only moved from their mere assertion to their mere assertion about someone else's mere assertion, from a first-hand baseless claim that they cannot valildate, to an even weaker second hand claim they cannot validate.

It has nothing to do with being ignorant or intelligent. It simply has to do with not being gullible. If I offered to sell you a car and claimed it had less than 10,000 miles, it would not make you ignorant if you insisted on seeing the odometer and insisted on having a mechanic check to make sure it hasn't been tampered with. Insisting on at least the same evidence we would insist on before buying anything else being sold to us, from cars to toilet paper, before commiting our lives to your deity, doesn't make us ignorant. We have a label for people that buy based on unprovable claims. We call those people suckers, an appellation which all religionists tend to apply to adherents of competing religions who have just as much or little cause to believe their unprovable claims as the unprovable claims you were indoctrinated with or have accepted.

I would point out that you yourself, according to your post, believe in only one god. Yet humans have proclaimed thousands of gods, all of which you doubtless deny as false superstition, including ones you've never even heard of, without ever examining the claims of their adherents, whom you also would likely say are deceived (though somehow, whether through your special virtue or god hating them and loving you for some reason, you were not deceived). You likely reject all these other "gods" as false, laughable, self-evidently baseless and without validity. You probably reject many of these religions as silly superstitition or the invention of evil-doers. I in fact agree with your assessment of all of those gods and religions, and merely add one more to the list of frauds, i.e. the fraud you prefer merely because of your cultural exposure, not because you can prove a dang thing more than they can.

Answer 7

Man made god.. atheists know this.

Man made up over 8,000 gods. Yours is just one more.

Hell is a fairytale, we know that too.

We are not insulting you, just your cannibalistic blood cult... we are instulting your BELIEFS, not you. If you don't like it, don't believe such stupid stuff.

Answer 8

You have become boring in that few of posted questions, congrats.

Answer 9

No question to answer so you are reported.

Answer 10

You're question makes you sound ignorant.