English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am interested in anything that may lead me to an honest opinion. Yours or even a web site that can give me some credible information.

2007-02-25 10:57:52 · 7 answers · asked by jasmine b 2 in Society & Culture Languages

7 answers

I love it. I got a free sample at an English as a second language (ESL) conference. It really is a good program, but it does take up a lot of memory on your computer.

2007-02-25 11:03:17 · answer #1 · answered by Jack T 3 · 0 0

I tried Rosetta Stone for Spanish. It was effective to learn basic words and sentences. It does not have any grammar or conjugation instructions though so it will be very hard to go beyond the basics with it

My college uses another software called TeLL me More, by Auralog. I found it more complete and less repetitive. It covers not only the basics, but also intermediate or advanced level. My goal was to become fluent so it was perfect for me. It has a lot of different activities: picture/word association, videos, dialogues,..., includes also grammar and conjugation. It has also more content than Rosetta Stone as far as level and number of hours of learning. Their speech recogntion is great so you can have a dialogue with the computer. They have a free demo at http://www.auralog.com/.
For independent reviews, you could check out http://learn-spanish-software-review.toptenreviews.com/ or the about.com websites (http://spanish.about.com,...)

The best way to learn a language would be through immersion, visiting these countries. Learning a language will require some time. In addition to software, you can have books which are useful as well. Audio CDs like Pimsleur for instance might help you out but you cannot get any feedback on your pronunciation so I did not like it so much.

2007-02-26 04:03:22 · answer #2 · answered by jparizona2007 5 · 0 0

good day! I even have utilized all 5 discs of German Rosetta Stone. that's an spectacular figuring out gadget for installation a organic working vocabulary and grammatical structures. besides the incontrovertible fact that it is going to *no longer* make you a fluent speaker. to instruct out to be fluent, you'll be able to desire to hold up a correspondence finally with interior of sight audio device. online there are a lot of communities the area you would be waiting to be sure online pen- and skype-pals to take a seem at this with. this might probably assist you out a TON once you finished Rosetta Stone (or Pimsleur, or despite attitude you bypass including). standard, I placed this RS + interior of sight Speaker attitude greater advantageous sturdy than taking a classification for a worldwide language, nonetheless it besides the incontrovertible fact that takes artwork. 5 tiers of RS take approximately a hundred 80-2 hundred hours to end. Then the unquestionably artwork starts

2016-09-29 21:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Ok, "Rosetta Stone" has been used since then, but it really dates back to 1798, when French troops discovered a part of a monument, written partially in Greek (known, of course), partially in demotic Greek (partly known) and partlially in hieroglyphics in a language then thought lost.

Back in Paris, a linguist named Champollion, realising that the classical and demotic Greek texts meant the same thing, made the reasonable assumption that the hieroglyphics were the same text in that unknown language.

There are lots of technical details here, but the end result was a key to the language and writing of the people who built the pyramids.

2007-02-25 11:29:57 · answer #4 · answered by obelix 6 · 0 0

I tried the demo for a language that I knew nothing about -- Arabic. I was surprised that after a few minutes, I was able to recognize words, sounds, and sentences. The demo didn't focus on writing or speaking so I can't answer for that. But I was/am impressed with it!

2007-02-25 11:04:16 · answer #5 · answered by barrych209 5 · 0 0

It's good if you have no background in the language. It's extremely basic, but you do learn without thinking in English, because you're always just looking at pictures. I think it's really overpriced; it doesn't need to be 500 bucks.

2007-02-25 11:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by bchic89 2 · 0 0

It's the best software if you are looking at learning a foreign language.

2007-02-25 11:02:09 · answer #7 · answered by WangDangSweetPoontang 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers