Is anyone familiar with this name? Eashoa'?

Question

Eashoa' is the Aramaic name of the one called Jesus.

Yeshua is the Jewish name; however the form of writing used in the area the Messiah trod was Aramaic. It would be safe to assume, the name inscribed on the ossuary would have been written and pronounced Eashoa', not Yeshua or Jesus.

The ossuaries are forgeries. They were most likely placed in the tomb by the Jews who could not explain a missing body guarded by roman soldiers. The Jewish priests would have had no problem sacrificing a family just like that of Eashoa' to perpetrate their plot. Hey, they killed the Son of God. What would prevent them from continuing in their sin by killing others? I don’t think there would be any limit to the conspiracy the priests would contrive.

The ossuaries are another plot to divert power from the resurrected Messiah Eashoa'. Do you think Cameron is doing this to further knowledge? It's all about the money. There is money in controversy and there is plenty of controversy here. I pray for James’ soul and ask that his eyes are opened to the lie he is multiplying. A lie conceived to detract from the power of the Holy God of heaven and earth. Satan up to his old tricks; no savior, no Satan, Satan wins.

Answer 1

Yes I am familiar with that name. :-)

"Eashoa'" is a pronounciation of ישוע that did not exist in Jesus' time or geographical location. It comes from a young eastern (specifically Syriac) dialect, where the dialect that Jesus and his compatriots would have spoken (in all likelihood) was western Judean Aramaic with a Galilean accent.

It would have been closer to "Yeshua" or "Yeshu." :-)

The evidence against the ossuaries is that the names are common, and that the inscriptions could have been forged.

The evidence for the ossuaries, however, is that they were investigated by many third parties and all agree on what the inscriptions say, that the inscriptions are actually written in a script that is from the proper period, and the likelihood of these names being in such an array as this is rather slim.

I've been able to take a closer look at the inscriptions based upon what was on the Discovery Channel site. The only one that I have trouble making out in is the one that is attributed to Jesus. I can just about read "son of Joseph" but the actual name "Jesus" is too scrambled for me to make out, and preceded by a strange cross-like shape. I also have yet to see any evidence that the inscriptions were a modern addition as all appear to be as aged as the other carvings on their respected ossuaries.

Overall, I'm not sure to make of it. :-)

Answer 2

EASHOA = JESUAS - ARAMAIC, E SHO THE TWO A'S ARE NO SOUNDED.

EASHOA = JESUS - HEBREW, EA SHO A - O IN HEBREW IS ALWAYS OO LIKE IN SCHOOL EA SHO A

HEBREW HAS NO LETTERS J-U-W-X SO ANY FORM OF SHUA WITH A U IS NOT POSSABLE ARE NEEDED OO IS THE SOUND O

Answer 3

Satan does NOT win, he was defeated on the mount when our Lord Jesus Christ died and was raised from the dead 3 days later