English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/02/25/tomb_arc.html?category=archaeology&guid=20070225073000

2007-02-25 07:37:33 · 31 answers · asked by Ballzy 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Ya, I guess we still have to deal with all the other bogus religions but Christians are a big chunk of the problem so it would help a bit.

2007-02-25 07:45:19 · update #1

31 answers

God I hope So!!!








Wahoo!!!

2007-02-25 07:40:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

How, in the name of Jesus Chri... Bad Oath.
How Did you get That we found his Body form an Article that states something like this...

"New scientific evidence, including DNA analysis conducted at one of the world's foremost molecular genetics laboratories, as well as studies by leading scholars, suggests a 2,000-year-old Jerusalem tomb could have once held the remains of Jesus of Nazareth and his family"

Did you see the COULD there? Can someone Please tell me how a Body, almost 200 Years old, Locked in a Cave, In the Desert, That isn't Embalmed, Be Jesus? Also... WHERE DID THEY GET JESUS DNA? Did the Vatican Keep a Copy of It? Or perhaps they have a Blood sample?
Please people, If Jesus Ever Lived, and Dies, and was Buried, and Didn't Rise again, Or even if he did, How can we Ever know through DNA?

2007-02-25 07:48:14 · answer #2 · answered by farcehorde 2 · 1 0

uhmmm no we gotta have controversy for at least 2-300 years; i really dont see a good reason Jesus couldnt have been married. Aside from Paul being a sexist pig that was a Jew killer prior to conversion (previously Saul) most of the other New Testament doesnt have a serious beef with women. With a significant percentage of americans believing the world is 6,000 yrs old this wont answer a single question for alot of people. They generally dont ask alot of questions so its no big deal for them.

2007-02-25 07:58:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

First ballzy, the tombs werent even confimred to be that of jesus of nazareths or mary magdalines, nor were the identities of the corpses determined, they have such sketchy dna analysis, that is is well pssible that they may not find out whos bones they are. not to mention that the place they were looking do not match the extra biblical or biblical evidence showing the location and time of Jesus burial. infact we do not know the exacty date and time of Jesus burial. If this is convincing enough evidence for you to reject Jesus, go ahead, butagain, the evidence is sketchy.

2007-02-25 07:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by Rated J for Jesus 2 · 0 1

It sounds like another hoax to get new converts, another desperate attempt at evangelism. We are less likely to move on as a society if the chrisians cant cut the crap and knock off the BS

2007-02-25 07:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think the important point is that Jesus and Mary had a son, not a daughter as in the Da Vinci Code.

2007-02-25 07:46:51 · answer #6 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 1 0

Unfortunately, we still have to wait for the DNA test to come back so we can see if it is a perfect match with God's DNA. Any of Joseph's DNA would disprove the virgin-birth theory and then the next round of negotiations would start. It's a long process. Be patient. Buddhist meditation will help you release your attachment to the result you desire.

2007-02-25 07:45:56 · answer #7 · answered by anyone 5 · 1 1

How? If Jesus's body was found that disproves Christianity as a whole, it means he did not rise to heaven in his body, which is what literally happened in the Bible, so if his body was found it would spell disaster for Christians, not hope.

2007-02-25 07:42:19 · answer #8 · answered by valkyrie hero 4 · 3 0

I doubt it, with all the evidence of the earths age being 4.6 billion years and still YECs invent unsupported "theories"; so whats the chance Christians are going to accept this?

2007-02-25 07:44:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your link doesn't work. This one does: http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2007/02/25/tomb_arc.html

And move on? No... I doubt it.

2007-02-25 07:42:33 · answer #10 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 2 0

Believed Found, dosent mean actual fact.

give it up already.. some things just simply will never be proven with out a shadow of doubt..

2007-02-25 07:46:50 · answer #11 · answered by lovin_livin_laughin 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers