Regarding the Islamo-fascist riots in reaction to the publishing of cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed, please look at the Web site http://www.zombietime.com/mohammed_image_archive/islamic_mo_full
The claim by Muslims that any depiction of the Prophet is forbidden is not upheld by the facts. This site shows no fewer than 18 Islamic images of the Prophet. If any picture of the "Prophet" is forbidden, why did Muslims create these pictures? It seems to me that the Islamo-fascists simply don't want anyone to have the right to show a picture of the Prophet in anything other than a good light. Forget freedom of the press. That only applies when the press praises Islam and its Prophet, or when the press insults Christianity and Judaism.
Show a picture of the Mohammed with a bomb in his turban? Blasphemy!
Show a crucifix in a glass of urine? It's art!
2007-02-25
06:57:55
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Weird Darryl
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
to abdulhafni: The claim is that ANY images of the "prophet" are forbidden, not just the offensive ones.
.
2007-02-25
09:37:23 ·
update #1