- trains - if Rail-track were doing their job properly then this accident would not have happened. I am impressed with Richard Branson's trains - Italian - most trains that derail the death rate is very high - not this time so hopefully something can be learnt from this - It was not the train but the rail - and if Rail-track are to blame I hope they will improve their service and realise that lives are at risk.
2007-02-25 09:49:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jean D 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There were points nearby, hence they are under suspicion. As said a set of points or anything else could fail at any time, even a few minutes after an inspection. Track is inspected weekly by sight, and mainlines are also checked fortnightly by the 'New Measurement Train' (A yellow Intercity125 full of test equipment to check the track - the test equipment is some of the most advanced in the world) and other test trains check secondary routes. Its more a case of better safe then sorry to re-check everything that could potentially have been a factor. The train might have already derailed before it hit the points, we won't know untill the Rail Accident Investigation Board publish their final report on completion of the investigation.
BTW the Virgin Pendolino mearly uses the italian tilting mechanism under licence. The train itself was designed and built in the UK
2007-02-25 18:25:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello there.
Network Rail check ALL POINTS on a regular basis, not as you say after an accident.
Unlike what you seem to think. A Set of Points CAN & Will fail at any point in time, so if you checked a set of point right now they may be working perfectly, but in half-an-hours time, they may have totally failed. It like when you turn the living room light it works 99.9% of the time, but then it suddenly fails when you lest expect it!
As you do not work in the Railway I think that it best if you do not judge until you have heard all the facts. I would advise you to look up the following web site, which is independent company to Network rail & investigates Rail Accidents
2007-02-25 07:02:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joolz of Salopia 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The points are regularly checked.
Unfortunately, as in any industry, human error is a factor. In the case of the recent incident in Cumbria, it is possible that a previously unknown problem has occurred, in which case lessons will be learnt to prevent is happening again.
Only two days after this accident, parallels are being drawn between it and the Potters Bar crash. In my opinion, people assume too much, too soon.
I suggest you wait for the official report in to this before you jump to conclusions.
2007-02-25 06:21:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
They did not have to check the points, from the TV pics the points were bent up in the air - clealry faulty!
It is about time this country changed the lines so that the eurotrain and the virgin trains can run to their full potential speed just like in europe. MAYBE then we may use the trains and leave our cars at home - oh and once they drop the fairs as well!
2007-02-25 04:36:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by thehotmustards@btinternet.com 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
there is a few good suggestion given in countless the different solutions. Please dismiss the glaring idiots. they're recommendations lifeless. here is my contribution. British trains are in many circumstances too short and so that they are in a position to get very crowded; in addition they greater often than not have automatic doors that p.c. as much as 30 seconds formerly schedulled depatrure time. So don't be tardy getting on board. The previous Hollywood scene the place the fanatics spend a while on the platform having emotional goodbyes basically won't paintings on a British prepare. With admire to the crowding - there may well be queues for the loos on long distance ones - so 'flow' formerly you shuttle. Please admire different visitors and don't make loud telephone calls. some thoughtless Gits continually shout or talk loudly into their mobiles. maximum prepare carriages are non-smoking. firstclass carriages are oftentimes (yet no longer continually) on the London end of the prepare. you will infrequently ever pay attention a glance after's whistle to announce departure so do no longer watch for it. this is oftentimes greater low-priced to shuttle long distance purchase buying tickets for the 'ranges' en-course particularly of one for the entire journey. this could flow horribly incorrect for you in case you're actually not careful, so i do no longer recommend it for first-time rail visitors. be waiting to disembark as quickly because of the fact the prepare stops. they gained't watch for you and in case you start up fumbling on your luggage on the 2nd it stops you will possibility being nonetheless on board whilst it strikes off. take exhilaration in. prepare shuttle is lots greater relaxing than using whilst this is performed nicely. in case you may replace trains make valuable that looking which platform your Connection departs from is the 1st element which you do upon getting off your previous prepare.
2016-10-01 23:16:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In the old days, there were signal boxes every couple of miles on the railway. Now they have signalling centres that cover hugh distances. The ones in this accident would have been Preston or Carlisle miles away to spot anything wrong with the track.
2007-02-25 09:24:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by des c 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The points at the crash site were only fixed weeks ago, makes you wonder about the state of the whole network.
If human error is to blame the people in question deserve to go down for manslaughter.
2007-02-25 04:36:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by richard_beckham2001 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Simply because they become the prime suspects in the accident investigation which follows ANY untoward event on a railway in the UK.
2007-02-25 22:06:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what should they do....just leave it. a fault has been found that may have caused this accident. that is why they are being extra careful.
2007-02-25 04:37:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋