Is it true that NYC lacks natural blondes?

Question

My colleagues at work have just returned from NYC. Most of their stay was in Manhattan; were they went to exhibit Ancient Egyptian, Coptic Christian and Islamic masterpieces in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. They also went to Brooklyn. Knowing that I'm greatly attravted to blondes, they've told me that the percentage of blondes in Manhattan and Brooklyn was very very low.

They visited Washington, DC and the Smithsonian Institution there and they also stayed in the Northern and Western suburbs of the nation's capital. They've stated that blondes there were very abundant and were physically athletic (in short, they're very beautiful).

My question is: When someone tours NYC for two months and notices that blondes are very rare there, is this reliable evidence that the percentage of NATURAL blondes in NYC has become minimal?

Answer 1

Such funny answers. There are lost ofd blonds; of course wont let you take the test to see if they are natrural.
...and Yorkville being German? That may have been true more than 50 years ago.

Answer 2

He should have done more of his homework by visiting the nude beach on Fire Island. Also I think there is a nude beach at Jacob Riis park in Queens, and Sandy Hook in New Jersey. Bests to get the facts right at work.

Answer 3

Since natural hair color is an inheirited trait, I find it difficult to believe that one place has drastically fewer people with it than another. Maybe NYC just has better hair colors--so a person who really is blonde doesn't look it after the dying?

Answer 4

Maybe it is because blonde hair like red hair is not very common and not a strong genetic gene like brown or black hair.

Answer 5

I noticed that many people here have dark hair because they're mixed with Hispanic.

Answer 6

no.