The bigger question: Why do you keep re-asking this question when you already have a question worded the exact same way open for answering?
Issues, much?
2007-02-25 03:05:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sweet n Sour 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They have still not been able to find the missing link between monkeys and humans. And until they do, no one can believe that we came from monkeys. Also, if we came from monkeys, then we have no spiritual guidance for our life. Our lives are meaningless. People don't want to hear that. Humans have something that other species don't have. We can reach out to a higher power. Other species don't have that ability, so I think that's what makes us unique, and no other species has came before us that has procreated and made us. To say that does not make one any more intelligent, and that's even more far out there than most religious beliefs.
2007-02-25 03:19:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Adam M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I used to be an ameba, living life completely free.
Then I became a fish, swimming in the sea.
Then I was monkey, hanging from a tree,
And now, I'm a doctor with a Ph. D.!
2007-02-25 03:02:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question goes to the fact that there is no parallel evolution. The fact that monkeys have not changed, and we have, is a indication that something is not right.
2007-02-25 03:05:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by great gig in the sky 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heavy question for so early. Chill out and read the comics. People are not getting smarter - still the same old warlike beings.
2007-02-25 03:02:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since it is a scientifically proven fact that there is an inverse relationship between intelligence and religious belief,
the answer is obvious.
The brainwashing doesn't help either.
The religious cannot accept any fact if it doesn't fit into their beliefs.
2007-02-25 03:03:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Skyhawk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I even have not heard Creationists say such issues, notwithstanding, that's a very valid, scientific ingredient in a fashion. All babies advance as much as replace into adults, interior an identical way, if evolution is real, we could desire to continually see an identical element everywhere in all existence varieties. relatively, we see it no the place, no longer something seems to be "evolving." there is a few version happening, all nicely interior the conventional perimeters positioned into the layout of the DNA. each and each time an evolutionist tries to offer an occasion of something evolving, I could snort because of the fact they could desire to no longer could supply any examples -- it may well be self glaring. One could no longer likely have the skill to destinguish between animals. One could continually be evolving into yet another, and at various ranges. jogs my memory of that action picture "the Land that ingredient Forgot" the place on one island, each point of evolutionary progression of guy could be present day in successive order from the main primitive to the main progressed. form of stupid on an island, yet on the entire planet, this is a diverse tale, we could desire to continually of course see it. One an island here, or a continent there, there could be guy at his various ranges of evolutionary progression. The greater time evolutionists throw at their concept, the greater this could desire to be. enable's basically stop and think of a minute and say to ourselves, "what if evolution is real?" If we relatively do this, then we are able to arise right away with those styles of genuine, complicated issues. Did you think of for a 2nd on the subject that I basically presented? you probably did? good, then it got here approximately to you that we could desire to continually see all the evolutionary ranges of progression with all the plant life and animals (and and so on) in the international earth too. and that they could desire to be presently, of course changing in front of our eyes, going from one step to the subsequent. Evolutionists should not be searching for examples, they could desire to have the examples via the trillions. Do I could ingredient out different glaring issues alongside those lines? issues like the device could desire to fail thousands and thousands of circumstances formerly it is going forward basically one step? would not it "click" in everybody's recommendations that we could desire to continually see on the spot exinctions, de-evolution everywhere? positioned down your faith evolutionists and p.c.. up the technology.
2016-10-01 23:10:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by deralin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pure ignorance
2007-02-25 03:01:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Apeman 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
EVERY argument they use is specious, thats just one of the sillier ones. Why? Because at whatever point they call it quits they really do not want to challenge their underlying faith.
2007-02-25 03:02:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I also say, why nothing evolved from Zebras, or bears or wolfs, or dogs or cats or dragons, or giraffes, oo elephants and so on and so and so on.
2007-02-25 03:03:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋