Like neanderthal man, the various Homo - ...
What are these supposed to be then, if not man's pre-evolutionary forms?
This has probably been asked before but I never saw it, so excuse it if it's a stale question.
2007-02-25 02:57:31 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Good question but they will deny, deny, deny that prehistoric man existed. Even when scientific evidence clearly shows they did.
*See, just like Gary said above....
2007-02-25 03:03:43 · answer #1 · answered by Stormilutionist Chasealogist 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I was raised a Christian (Lutheran); baptized, confirmed and everything.
I am also a science person. Which is why I struggle with everything I was taught growing up. Evolution has scientific proof. Makes more sense to me.
But how can you deny the proven historical facts in the Bible?
Good question. I'll be watching to see what answers you get. I hope people are nice about it. They're so angry here in this section.....
2007-02-25 11:04:44 · answer #2 · answered by KJ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The usual answers I get when I ask this question are:
1. Carbon dating doesn't work.
2. Scientists don't know their bones.. they are mis-identified
3. Satan planted them there to deceive us into believing in evolution.
2007-02-25 11:06:01 · answer #3 · answered by Kallan 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is not true, most christians i know agree with evolution, they believe that science and God goes hand in hand.
2007-02-25 11:02:47 · answer #4 · answered by Eryn v 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They choose to ignore such things
2007-02-25 11:03:08 · answer #5 · answered by Apeman 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
They are Adams and Eves.
2007-02-25 11:12:19 · answer #6 · answered by David G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All the so called pre-hstoric ansestors have been shown to be fallacies..., mis interpretation of bones , etc.
2007-02-25 11:00:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
Just men. Or in the case of some, just apes.
2007-02-25 11:03:31 · answer #8 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋