Nothing is impossible theoretically, but I do not think that despite all extreme conflicts we would reach another World war. We could tackle this issue in details, of course. Unfortunately, the US High Administration policy now is not wise and give a lot reasons for "sparkles" too.
Wish you luck!
2007-02-25 03:08:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by sunflower 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
some political scientists are saying that this is the start of what we will come to know as WW3. ie. the Iraq war and heightening conflict in the mideast. now that Iran and the US can't stop stepping on one another's toes, we may just be seeing the beginning of something worse. just recently American troops captured some Iranian Generals or something in Iraq and are holding them prisoner. we'll see what that leads to.
personally i don't see a nuclear war at all, soon. that's too destructive too fast. it is very sad though that War is just not going to go away, from here on out, for a long long time, we will be a war torn world. most of us won't see it's direct impact, luckily, we will watch it...and it will dictate more and more of our freedoms in our lives.
may you all find peace and happiness somewhere, somehow.
2007-02-25 03:10:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by yugioh_1776 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Israel's subject is that it has no strategic intensity. 3 small nukes ought to wipe the completed u . s . a . out. they could be proactive and would in all probability launch a preemptive conflict in the event that they felt threatened like they did in 1967. this would bring about the difficulty of at as quickly as related to an Islamic coalition against Israel. mutually as the present administration is anti- Israeli, the yank human beings help the country, and would call for we returned them up. The Muslim international replace right into an prolonged term Soviet shopper area, and the Russians would experience some criminal duty to grant them with (extensive-unfold) weapons. do not underestimate a thousand million radicals armed with AK-47s. they may well be a tension to be reckoned with whether the Russians by no skill intervened quickly. on the present time eventualities related to Russia, China, N Korea, Vietnam, or any coalition of those countries looks extra distant. whether, Korea,Taiwan and the South China Sea are 3 Asian flash-factors that ought to set off a conflict between the u . s . and the p.c.. In any of those eventualities South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam (alongside with Japan, the Philippines, and Thailand) would be on the yank ingredient of the equation, not our enemies.
2016-10-16 11:09:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by scafuri 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably not, only because the only way WW3 would happen is if China &/or Russia got into a war with the US and right now that is the last thing they want to do. China's econmy is booming as is Russia's and things are better in those two countries than in decades and they don't want to change that by provoking the US into WW3. Plus the US 1st strike capablities on Russia & China could wipe out most their nuclear ICBMs before they could do any harm to the US.
2007-02-25 03:00:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Blame Bush
2007-02-25 03:09:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not only what you stated, but with the proliferation of nuclear weapons, all some nut has to do is to push the button, and WW III here we come.
2007-02-25 04:11:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Contrary to popular belief, WW3 does not have to involve nuclear weapons. I believe we are in the first stages of a world war at this very moment.
2007-02-25 02:57:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by desperado4363 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
yes if world war II was possible then world war III is possible
2007-02-25 03:02:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sweish Shannon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It started when dumbya invaded iraq.
2007-02-25 03:05:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by chickenhawk_plucker 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-02-25 02:56:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋