Manger scenes don't outrage me, unless they are on public property being supported by my tax dollar. Perhaps someday the fundies will learn enough about the constitution to know why.
2007-02-24 23:51:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
93% of "so called Christians" may describe themselves as Christians, but do anything but ACT like Christians, so that 93% is a meaningless number. They are not really Christians at all.
I don't have any problem with the gays parade, the manger scene, displaying the ten commandments, the Torah, muslims wearing burkas. This is America and you're free, or at least you used to be free, to say and do whatever you want as long as it does not harm others in some way. I do find the gay parade outrageous, just as I find a KKK parade outrageous. But I do support the right for these people to conduct their parades. And if Chrsitians or any other religion want to display themselves in public places, fine by me. The politically correct bull**** that this country has become is just so sad and pathetic. Demonstrates a weak society when people have nothing better to do with their lives than whine, cry, and moan all day about absoluttely nothing!!!!!
2007-02-25 08:08:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by mike9626 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals are indeed a silly bunch.
Then again, so are people that generalize.
Not all liberals don't want manger scenes removed. Not all liberals like gay pride parades. Therein is the folly of generalizing.
Remember, people are individuals, not representations of a group. If generalization were allowed, the Christians could be represented by Fred Phelps and his Baptist Church...the group that protests funerals of soldiers because America is too kind to homosexuals. It is rather rude to show up at a funeral and say the soldier deserved to die. Are all Christians this way? All Conservatives? Not at all. Generalizing, however, suggests it is so. Don't generalize. Someone alien might think you represent all of mankind and bring about the destruction of the world. I'd rather not perish because somebody else generalized your generalizations. Thank you.
2007-02-25 08:12:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by fuzzinutzz 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are describing the hypocrisy of the EXTREME liberal. Not all liberals are this extreme.
Argle didn't want to address this hypocrisy.
Mike h didn't get the comparison used to expose hypocisy.
Mike 9 - What percentage of those 93% are hypocrites has no bearing on whether they have just as much right to express themselves as those in the "Gay Pride" parades.
And to you "I thought so" the liberals could probably come up with some comparisons to illustrate the hypocrisy of extreme conservatives.
2007-02-26 02:37:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Smart Kat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
THAT ABOUT SUMS IT UP
Don't forget that Liberals:
1. Only represent 7% of the military because they are cowards and armchair subversives;
2. Al Qaeda sympathizers;
3. Flag burners; and
4. Jesus-haters.
...among many other perverse loser qualities and causes.
2007-02-25 07:51:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Homophobia is funny. Usually indicates a closet homosexual.
I'm not gay and really don't care for it ,but, you're correct in saying they have a protected right to it. I don't like the flamer's parades and don't really think they should be allowed unless cleaned up.
How you managed to work Jesus in there is strange.
2007-02-25 07:55:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by mike h 4
·
2⤊
1⤋