2007-02-24 23:39:22 · 5 answers · asked by mefeelsgreat9 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's the 64 million dollar question..
I can't figure it out. What is ironic, is they can't figure it out either.
2007-02-24 23:43:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The only people validating and emboldening the enemy is George and Dick. Al Qaeda was never involved in Iraq until the US gov't stuck their nose in to try and get control of Iraq's oil fields. As often happens with conservative's simplistic minds, they do too little too late to achieve anything.
The liberals will have to come along behind and clean up Dubya's and dead eye Dick's mess.
2007-02-25 07:48:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
its to mask the power grab from the razor thin mandate of 06. liberals needed an excuse to whip up public support so the same failed tax and spend ideas from previous administrations could be reinstalled. iraq was the perfect topic as the public really doesnt understand al qaeda and the severity of the terrorism situation and the pelosi ites saw a perfect opportunity to spread this type of poltics by using sentiment. the problem as you and i obviously see is whats popular definitley isnt always whats right and in this case the consequences could be devestating.
2007-02-25 07:51:34 · answer #3 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are You still drunk from last night?
I am a liberal and am doing nothing of the sort! I support the military men and women so much that I believe we need to get them out of Bush/Cheney's little war.
Put them in harm's way ONLY if there is a clear cut danger to the United States. Iraq did not pass that test.
Here's a tip- Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly are merely entertainers.
2007-02-25 07:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by mike h 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why ask the same idiotic questions that have been answered 1000's of times over and over and over again?
2007-02-25 07:44:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋