English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Everyone knows he had them, he used them on the Kurds...come on liberals let's here more excuses..

2007-02-24 22:39:06 · 10 answers · asked by bigbro3006 3 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

We know he used them on the Kurds and Iranians(and by stupidity on his own troops); the point is they degrade.Stockpiles only last a few years on the outside. Did he have them when we invaded? Seems no.

2007-02-24 23:01:14 · answer #1 · answered by guy o 5 · 1 0

The weapon of mass destruction was changing the price of crude oil from dollars to euros. The American economy would have imploded. Do a little research and scratch the surface of the lies youve been fed by the TV and newspapers. Do you think if Saddam had weapons of that magnitude, he wouldnt have used them...?
Think about it. Who stood to gain the most...?

2007-02-24 22:52:41 · answer #2 · answered by Merovingian 6 · 2 0

But the (rhetorical) question remains: Where are the WMDs Saddam was supposed to have right before the invasion which led to the current occupation?

2007-02-24 22:46:31 · answer #3 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 3 0

It's not only liberals. Had this white house group of clowns run the part after the invasion with ANY ability most people would have over looked the crap they dreamed up to start it.

2007-02-24 22:46:18 · answer #4 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 0 1

You are correct in stating that he had them. In fact, it was Donald Rumsfeld who did the deed, as directed by Ronald Reagan, in our proxy war with Iran/USSR.

But if you're referring to those "WMDs," their potency, in the intervening years, would have been greatly diminished to near harmlessness. And, in fact, those "WMDs" were located, and what's under your kitchen sink is more powerful than those "WMDs."

If you're referring to our Idiot King's assertion that Saddam was actively engaged in developing and positioning WMDs -- which was, in fact, his administration's key assertion for invading Iraq -- you are every bit as deluded as our Idiot King's defenders.

However, even the administration, led by our Idiot King and his band of ultra-right buffoons couldn't stick to the WMDs story, when it became clear that their intelligence was wrong.

2007-02-24 23:11:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Instead of being a coward, chickenshi+, go to Iraq and prove it.

Sign up for military service if you think the weapons exist, instead if hiding like a coward behind a computer.


.

2007-02-24 23:05:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They use it as a anti war policy. They use it as their agenda of Bush hating. When all of it is found they will just say Bush planted it their to cover up his lies. WM D's really does not matter today, what matters is making Iraq a civilized country all over including Baghdad. Most of it is calm now, but, that does not make a good news story against Bush

2007-02-24 23:01:09 · answer #7 · answered by meathead 5 · 0 3

We know he had them because the Americans and British sold them to him.

2007-02-24 22:42:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In Iran,,,,,bush will be lighting up the stockpiles soon,,enjoy the show.....decider

2007-02-24 22:58:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well - where are they then ?

2007-02-24 23:02:47 · answer #10 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers