English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My Landlord has failed to action against another Tenant for Noise & Disturbance even though the Tenant accepted a Undertaking in Court twice, the Undertaking has now expired.

Can i take action against my Landlord for Breach of Agreement for failing to ensure my Peaceful Enjoyment???

I have requested during the period of the Undertaking that the Landlord take action, but they refused. Now they are taking action but i have to go through the process all over again and have suffered further Neighbour Nuisance due to the failings of the Landlord. Any advice welcome. Thanks

2007-02-24 20:55:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

7 answers

Hi Neil,

It seems that there is a duty of care issue here. You may have a case but it could get messy because there is a 3rd party tort here as well. Your claim may be affected under privity of contract unless the other tenant rents from the same landlord.

You need to talk to a solicitor who specialises in contract law or landlord and tenant law.

Sorry I can't be of more assistance.

Good luck

2007-02-25 00:17:02 · answer #1 · answered by LYN W 5 · 0 0

Article 1 of the first protocol to the Human Rights Act, (peaceful enjoyment of possession and general protection of property rights) provides domestic courts with powers to compel landlords to act in a certain way and, in some circumstances, to order compensation.

It is not possible to bring an action in contract because there was no undertaking between you and the other tenant or you and your landlord.

2007-02-24 22:31:39 · answer #2 · answered by stephen.oneill 4 · 0 0

first you must inform the landlord in writing that you cannot enjoy the quiet peace and comfort of your home. if, after 2 weeks the problem has not been solved file a rent escrow action against him. that means the court holds the money and the landlord doesn't get paid.

2007-02-25 01:22:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, and also you would possibly want to of concept about that before you further that unfavorable canines who has already been bounced round to a house he cant stay in. both destroy your employ and bypass someplace puppy pleasant, or you could might want to eliminate him. Jeez, i can by no potential understand why those who opt for to be puppy vendors opt for to bypass to an section that does no longer enable pets then have the nerve to blame the owner at the same time as they opt for them to eliminate it. I understand you imagine you helped the canines, yet think ofyou've got chanced on those who may have a canines the position they stay to take him or helped the canines many different strategies except taking it your self. i'm a landlord and in a number of my houses I settle for canines, some I dont, and that i have 2 canines myself . i'm a canines lover and am sorry i won't be able to help such an sick concept out descision no remember how properly intentioned it replaced into.

2016-10-17 08:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Go to Citizens' Advice Bureau (CAB). Give them all the facts. They will be able to advise you, write letters on your behalf, etc.

Their advice is independent, confidential and free. They deal with this sort of problem all the time and have info/access to all the up-to-date laws, procedures etc.

2007-02-24 23:29:18 · answer #5 · answered by squeaky guinea pig 7 · 0 0

Just move.

2007-02-24 21:02:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

kick his butt big time

2007-02-24 21:05:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers