Would letting the CIA assassinate Ahmadinejad be a better alternative to war?

Question

Same thing for Chavez. Seems the people aren't the problem just the nutjobs in charge.

On second though Mossad or Shin Bet would probably take care of ol Mahmoud before war even began. There is no need to waste American or Iranian lives when a simple bullet to the head or a cyanide laced toothbrush would solve the problem

Answer 1

2 in the turban

Answer 2

And why exactly would CIA assassinate Ahmadinejad and Chavez?Oh,yes,now being against US policies is a crime and people should pay with their lives for that..
No,they are not the problem,the problem are the ones who attack countries ,who start wars without any reason and who can't find any solutions to end the mess that they started...Not people who speak against those kind of people...

Answer 3

This Q is a very good example of the american terrorist brain,
They think they own the world and they have the right to kill anybody or attack any country who doesnt comply with their orders.
So,what do u think if the Iranians or the venzwelans think also they have the right to assassin bushit & cheny cause they r threatning their country???
What an arrogant terrorist way of thinking!!!

Answer 4

yep..its always better to take out enemies quietly....see what happened to Edward 1st or "Edward the Foolish"...there wasnt a mark on his dead body...everything worked out fine...

Answer 5

IT COULD BE THE SPARK THAT IGNITED A WAR...that's the problem with the US. we've been involved with black ops for a long time and we're good at it...but it actually creates a worse problem for us in the long run

Answer 6

no--they should did that with saddam ---but that was not the plan-----halliberton wanted war

Answer 7

it's impossible.