English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

who is better and why?

2007-02-24 20:25:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Cricket

13 answers

Tendulkar's batting averages are slightly better, and he can also contribute with occassional bowling which gives more to the team - although Lara is a marginally better fielder. I don't think those things alone are what separates them though, as I think it has to come down to consistency, motivation and contribution to the team as a whole - in a team sport played by individuals. Because of this I think Tendulkar far outstrips Lara.

Lara admittedly hasn't had the same level of talent around him in the West Indies, but he seems capable of "giving up" far too often and his big scores have often been scored when they haven't counted. Conversely, Tendulkar rarely seems to give up the fight and his attitude not only scores himself runs but contributes to players around him playing better as well - helping make India a better team.

In a scrap I'd far rather have Sachin Tendlukar on my side than Brian Lara. It's also worth noting that the greatest cricketer ever to have played, Sir Donald Bradman, voiced opinions along similar lines.

2007-02-24 23:29:23 · answer #1 · answered by ClaudeS 4 · 1 1

Well

Both of thems are world top players,

Sachin start playing for india when he was very young and lara came when he was aounrd 20-25,

Sachin still plays like he used to but lara is just now gone down he don't play he used to,

but if u go back to 1990s than its going to be Lara the best,

I go for Sachin,

2007-02-25 01:29:14 · answer #2 · answered by Prince_of_rock 1 · 0 0

Without Doubt Lara is Best because he is a middle order Batsman and played only 290 matches and did over then 10000 score But Sachin played over then 375 Matches also a Opener That's way Lara is Great...

2007-02-24 20:49:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

Sachin 60% Lara 40%

2007-02-24 20:29:52 · answer #4 · answered by Wax Phantom 3 · 0 2

Lara is a much better batsman because he has has a very poor West Indian team to play with,while Sachin Tendulkar has the likes of Dravid and Ganguly to play with.

2007-02-25 03:11:08 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

SACHIN TENDULKAR observing their occupation,Sachin is amazingly lots forward from Lara in the two tests & ODIs.In runs,he's definitely 15 runs short which he will do in few days,Sachin has scored over 70 centuries,& over 20000 runs in the two those codecs,& Lara should not be even on the part of it.Lara is spectacular,yet Sachin is extra advantageous.Sachin is a real legend,he has have been given optimal guy of the suits than all human beings,a real adventure-winner,& he's definitely the spectacular!

2016-11-25 22:02:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Sachin Tendulkar is comparable only to Viv Richards, Don Bradman and Sunny Gavaskar. Lara, Ponting, Hayden, Mohd. Yusuf, etc are in lesser league.
Lara himself has admitted that Sachin is in a much higher leagure to himself.

2007-02-25 03:02:08 · answer #7 · answered by steve s 3 · 0 0

Sachin is better because he has got more batting technique and skill than Lara

2007-02-24 23:31:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No doubt...... Its sachin only..... He came well after his injuries and being an allrounder he gives his hundred percent at all the times..... The records shows clearly that who has got highest number of runs behind.....

2007-02-24 20:50:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

lara scores big runs

2007-02-25 00:08:06 · answer #10 · answered by john 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers