English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In other words, can one receive Ph.D. without an advisor. Do the top universities allow this for smart students?

2007-02-24 20:18:19 · 5 answers · asked by x_squared 4 in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

Why the hell one wants this? Because some students may not want their achievements to be shared by an advisor.

2007-02-24 21:23:42 · update #1

5 answers

Actually, you get into most US PhD programs by finding a mentor and interesting them in working with you. When applications are considered this person will argue for you, over some other applicant. Most important, when it comes to funding this person will try to get you enough funding to get through the program. So, without an advisor you have less chance of being admitted to a program and less chance of getting decent funding. I suppose it depends on your field, but I don't know of anybody who has had trouble getting their masters thesis or doctoral dissertation recognized as their work, rather than that of their mentor. Yes, some of your work leading up to those elements may list you as a secondary author when you really did all of the research. On the other hand, at that level your work is unlikely to be published without someone else's name on it. Since talking to your potential mentors and current students in the programs that you apply for should be part of your "shopping" process, you can and should ask about this practice.

2007-02-25 03:58:01 · answer #1 · answered by pag2809 5 · 0 0

Theres a difference between smart and arrogant. If you are a student you need an advisor---- just like a top selling writer needs and editor, they advise on your thesis. This is nt only for phd but for Masters thesis as well. Why wouldnt you want an advisor? Its better to have one. If you are working on someothing and lets say on your own , and when you submit youre told you went way off standard00then you start over. Your advisor would have recommended changes at some point. And if youre so smart youll prob only here positive comments which will boost your ego even more!

2007-02-24 20:23:27 · answer #2 · answered by tziamin 2 · 0 0

Yes, but even the "smart students" will find that an advisor can help them get things done more efficiently. Advisors are not there to stand in someone's way. Good advisors stay out of your way unless you need them. That's what mine did and I am still thankful.

2007-02-24 20:22:56 · answer #3 · answered by mtnflower43 4 · 0 0

definitely, i think of each US college, a minimum of a impressive one, calls for the GRE for a PhD software. there is not any averting it. you're able to as properly ask which regulation faculties do no longer require the LSAT. None to my concepts. Or which scientific faculties do no longer require the MCAT. returned, none to my concepts. and finally, you do no longer prefer to flow to a college that would not require a GRE score, whether one existed. No respectable software might settle for applicants with out one. the foundation of their admissions judgements infrequently rides on the GRE score, in fact that is many times disregarded, even nonetheless that is rather lots mandatory all in the process graduate college education on the PhD point.

2016-11-25 22:02:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

nop

2007-02-24 20:20:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers