English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

WHO IS THE BETTER LEGEND?

2007-02-24 20:18:04 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

15 answers

undertaker

2007-02-24 20:19:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The Undertaker!
14:0

2007-02-25 04:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by Triple H 5 · 2 0

The better legend is Hogan. As an entertainer he brought the fans back in. Both outlived themselves as far as wrestling too long. In the end though if you look up who was packing the houses it was Hogan. By the time the Undertaker got well known everyone was already there. Oh and people this wasn't who is a better wrestler. Hogan was not that great as a Wrestler. He was a DRAW though. He brought the fans in and packed the houses. As a wrestler he knew like 3 or 4 moves. As a wrestler he would likely have lost every match, but they are scripted and he was so big to the fans that he won. Think about THAT as who is the bigger legend. As a wrestler the Undertaker could win matches.

2007-02-25 06:39:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Undertaker

2007-02-25 05:45:38 · answer #4 · answered by 111 3 · 0 0

Undertaker. Hulk Hogan was never any good in the ring, just a character that (for some reason) everyone marked for. See also, John Cena.

2007-02-25 04:52:56 · answer #5 · answered by almighty_malachi 5 · 1 0

Undertaker.
Hogan has had a notorious history of real bad backstage politics, and is an all round ********. Although Undertaker has also been reported to be like that, he is no where near as bad as Hogan, and has been embraced by the other wrestlers as locker room leader since.. forever.

Example of Hogan being a dick: In the WM match against Ultimate Warrior, he went against the planned finish and kicked out at four, and then presented Warrior with the titles because he knew that in doing so the limelight would be on him as he left. (He confessed to this is one of his random books)

Example of Taker being a dick: Kicks up a fuss because he bled with Cowboy Bob Orton at the Armageddon Hell in a Call, and it turned out Orton had Hepatitis, management knew but didn't tell Taker...

So which one do you think is worse?

Undertaker is easily the better of the two, both in ring and out of ring.

2007-02-25 04:33:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Simply Hulk Hogan.My sister knew Hulk Hogan and not Undertaker. ;)

2007-02-25 04:36:34 · answer #7 · answered by Cfoo_master 4 · 0 1

I think it'll be a tie as no one knows or no one will reckon such a thing. Both are the best in the business and who would ever think of putting up such a match?
You see, it's a matter of fact that obviously, Undertaker is far younger than Hulk as you know, so even if any one wins, it'll be a got up match and then, no doubt Undertaker would win.
But even then, I would still say that it cannot happen.
Even if it happens, Hulk will obviously get a gilt chance to win.

2007-02-25 04:32:37 · answer #8 · answered by Agniva Das 2 · 0 0

Undertaker!

2007-02-25 04:26:04 · answer #9 · answered by boilerrat 7 · 2 1

The undertaker because undertaker beat hogan twice and hogan beat undertaker once so i would think the undertaker is better then hogan.

2007-02-25 04:50:07 · answer #10 · answered by timothy 5 · 1 2

everybody even people that dont watch wrestling know of the name hulk hogan and he's accomplished more in his career so even tho i grew up loving the undertaker ill have to say hogans the bigger legend

2007-02-25 04:23:00 · answer #11 · answered by v.e.n.d.e.t.t.a 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers