What gives the USA the right to threaten to attack Iran?

Question

Iran is an independant sovereign country. What gives USA the right to demand that Iran must cease nuclear activity, that it cannot develop nuclear power and that it has no right if it so wishes to use the byproduct for military development as the USA already does.

When Dick Gheney was specifically asked if the USA had plans to attack Iran his best answer was that he could not rule out anything.

By what right can the USA attack, or even threaten to attack, another country for developing technology which many other countries already have and when the USA is even spending billions of dollars to upgrade their own nuclear arsenal.

I don't see how anyone can reasonably argue with the response of the president of Iran when he said that he was willing to agree to discontinue nuclear activity before comming to the negotiating table providing that the same rule applied to every country at the table, including the USA.

Who is the retard BigBro? Who says they sponsor terrorist organizations? Are you getting that from the same team who got lots of USA servicemen killed on the basis of non existant weapons of mass destruction and non existant Al Queda forces which could not be found in Iraq after you invaded? How many times do you want to repeat the same mistakes?

Yesteday Jeeper. Dick Cheney refused to rule it out and said all options are open.

Answer 1

Agree with you one hundred percent, but i suppose the USA has the same right to threaten Iran as they did Iraq. The curious thing is both countries have an abundance of oil.

Answer 2

When has the US threatened to attack Iran ?

President Bush has said repeatedly that the US has no plans on attacking Iran.

How you can get from the President publicly saying no plans to attack, to the US planning on attacking, I'd like to hear.

The US and the rest of the countries in the UN, have the right to develop policies that they think will help their countries.

Iran has the right to try and develop nuclear technology.

But the US and the UN have the right to not trade with Iran or allow Iranians citizens to travel outside Iran.

So Iran has to make a choice, they can continue on their present course and be more and more isolated from the rest of the world, or they can listen to the rest of the world.

I don't see how you can possibly have a problem with that.


PS: Since when is saying all options are on the table, threatening to attack ???

Lets be honest here, you said that the US has threatened to attack Iran, thats flat out not true.

The US has bent over backwards to solve the issue thru the UN and out European ally's

Answer 3

the total thing approximately having the main effective militia interior the international facilitates you to % what individuals could do. saying that, nuclear weapons interior the arms of Iran is a disaster waiting to take place, and if the u . s . would not manage it then Israel in all probability will. the two way, international conflict 3 right here we come. mutually as we are nuking Iran, suicide bombers are letting rip on us. besides the fact that happens, Iran would be glassed yet we would be hurting as properly.

Answer 4

Because they sponsor terrorist organizations, retard. We don't want them to develop a nuke that might end up in L.A.. We can argue about the "rights" of country all you want, but the superpowers signed the Nonproliferation Treaty that banned the production of nuclear weapons by countries that didnt already have them in hopes they could control the use of such weapons.So I guess when Russia and China and England and France and whoever else signed that treaty, that pretty much answered your question about who has the right.

Answer 5

I guess it's OK that they threatened to wipe us and Israel off the face of the earth!