How many people think JFK was killed in by a conspiracy, not "lone gunman"?

Question

No theories necessary, just what do you honestly think?

if you want to give a theory feel free. 5 Stars for best answer.

Serious Answers Only PLEASE!

Answer 1

We see official FBI intel warning of Oswald BEFORE November 1963--and NOTHING was done. Secret Service protection was grossly lax, leaving JFK wide open--something that will NEVER happen today. Then there's the suspiciously long trail of unexplained deaths of those who could shed light on the murder.

And what about that young buck Gerald Ford--who chaired The Warren Commission (and inculded several JFK political enemies)--funny how fast he got pushed up to be President, isn't it? You know, Ford always had the look of a man holding a very shameful secret......and stood by the ridiculous "Magic Bullet theory".

The picture of Oswald holding the rifle has suspicious hints of photo altering--so do what few JFK autopsy photos National Archive thieves didn't steal (they snatched off with other vital evidence....like JFK's forensically perserved brain).

Computer focus sharpened treatment of the Zapruder film shows indications JFK was hit from the front, slicing flesh just ABOVE his right ear....and EXITING the back of his head--where we see Jackie vainly reaching BACK for pieces of his skull.

And while on the subject of film....we do see at least THREE MORE cams running or ready when the fatal head-shot was made. One never before seen video has surfaced, filmed seconds before the first shot. And I think the hints from THAT film may well put the first shot comming from the DAL-TEX building NOT the Book Depository.

Enough to make a loud public call to force open the "seal" of the factual documentation on JFK's murder--despite surviving Kennedy opposition??? Hardly enough--but I DO think "the smoking gun" evidence is just around the corner from being shown....and what facts it will bring!!

Answer 2

We will never really know. The Warren Commission was developed simply to "prove" it was a lone gunman. Also look at how they say it happened. The "magic bullet" theory. Oh come on. Even if a bullet COULD travel that path, how does it do it in pristine condition. The firing alone would have left markings. Clearly the bullet "found" on the scene was a plant. Oswald could have fired the shots that fast, that much is basically proven. He was an expert marksman and it has been proven the bullets could be fired at the rate required. That still leaves how the bullet had no marks, it leaves why the Warren Commission didn't investigate or interview a long list of people. Yeah something is missing. I think a Conspiracy makes the most sense when you look at how much is missing. If it isn't a conspiracy why so many missing pieces?

Answer 3

I think that yes, the procedures, some other things were flawed, but there was no conspiracy. Lone gunman. Lee Harvey Oswald was a trained marksman. People will always believe what they want to. Everyone goes on and on about how the bullet could not have done this or that...but none of these people have actually treated gunshot wounds in an ER setting or really has any experience other than texts. Bullets do tremendous damage and can bounce around quite a bit. If some people want to believe that there was a conspiracy, fine. He's dead how many years now? It was way before my time.

Answer 4

I was very young when John Kennedy was killed....3rd grade, Today I am fifty four years old, I have been an outdoors man , hunting and fishing exclusively with my spare time, was employed by an ammunition manufacturer, in my life i have shot approximately 75 deer 25 turkeys....small game too numerous to mention, i am considered a very good shot, I am a Vietnam Era Veteran and was awarded the marksmanship ribbon by the United States Air Force.......and the bottom line is: that one man could not have fired the rounds fired with the rifle that Oswald supposedly used, I don't know how they did it or who" they" are but i am 100% positive who didn't fire those rounds....i am not saying that Oswald wasn't one of many shooters....but he wasn't the lone gunman

Answer 5

I've seen a lot of theories (few sensible, many ridiculous), and all the theories have holes of some sort

The official account is the only one that is 100% possible

Everything that's been shown can be proven (Yes, the single-bullet theory is technically possible), and the "holes" in that story have been dug up through hard research by people looking for holes

If your looking for a hole you'll find it, but the only plausible theory is the official one and that's what I believe in

Answer 6

I love a mystery as much as the next man...........but I become very tired of lazy, lazy people who do not bother to check their sources or their facts and merely repeat unproven, misquoted or simply unfactual bits of information as "evidence" of a conspiracy.

More often than not the simplest explanation is the right one - even if it is very boring, prosaic and ultimately unsatisfying.

I have never seen or read any proper substantiated evidence that points to anything other than Oswald having carried out the assassination alone. As for his motivation, who knows what goes on inside the head of a nutcase ? Why did Chapman kill Lennon ? (Also, incidentally, the subject of a CIA conspiracy).

Answer 7

everybody who has researched it

read the comparison to lincolns execution
the similarities are more than uncanning
check Kennedies film
there were no security guards around him at the time of the shooting
the orders came from the car behind
find out who controls security and you find the killers
and they have been at it for a longtime
there were bullets coming from all directions
the killing of the Austrian prnce was similar ,the security stepped back
bang and the securty returned
dito lincoln ,dito Kennedy
check www.infowars bound to be some there on it

Answer 8

Honestly, I don't know. But I do think there was probably more than one gunman. I think a conspiracy is possible. I wouldn't put it past our government.

Answer 9

CONSPIRACY.

John and Robert were creating enemies galore during their time in office. Somehow I've always 'felt' that THE enemy all along was domestic, not Cuban, nor Russian but Americans in powerful government positions then.