The only real way to convince someone is to create a complex program and execute it under difficult conditions. In an extreme the Java can be compiled to run on a specific target.
High performance can only be evaluated on a particular platform and for a particular problem. There are places where Java will not be suitable (nuclear simulations, NSA decoding, etc.) but under normal application needs it does a pretty good job. HOwever as you can see from the other answers the only way to prove it is by demonstration
2007-02-25 09:34:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't know what you mean by "high performance", but as far as portability is concerned, Java is a better candidate. Also, there is something in Programming called parallel programming, and Java can do parallel programming while C++ is unable to!
Hope this gives you a brief highlight!
2007-02-25 02:37:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by A.Samad Shaikh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, its not a high performance language. C is a high performance language. Java is like halfway between a script language and a compiled language. But it does look nice.
2007-02-25 01:26:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steve T 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Show them a complex Java application, such as a game or some diagramming software. They'll see for themselves that performance is just fine. But be sure to use a recent JVM - 1.4.2 or later.
2007-02-25 01:44:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by felixp7 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It isn't!
Unless you're making Java for graphics, then fine, it's excusable .. but please use C/++ for programming in general!
Java can also be decompiled to it's original source, C/++ cannot without 80% errors.
Dys.
2007-02-25 01:27:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
System.out.println("Hello World!");
}
}
That is almost sexy.
2007-02-25 01:57:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋