2007-02-24 16:21:48 · 15 answers · asked by Scott E 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
yes I am definitely tired of voting for the lesser of the evils, surely there is someone out there who is a decent man who is basically honest ,he doesn't haft to be perfect just some one who would put America and her people first, and the people not stupid enough to listen to the Zionist owned new;s media AND T,V, and vote for this man and hopefully he would have enough sense to pass legislation to out law this type of reporting, and make it possible for convictions for false reporting, and stop supporting our enemy's tat we will end up fighting in our own streets,so what ever we do we should not ever elect a lawyer as they are inheritally dishonest, but , a good business man who can run a successful business, running the country is big business and lawyers are not good business men,
2007-02-24 17:05:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm tired of voting for the lesser of two evils myself. Even though I started voting in 2004, I'm already fed up up with the way our country is going. I'm a registered Democrat but I think I will vote for a third party. I wish Tancredo and Paul run for a third pary unity ticket. My main concern for the 08 election is illegal immigration. Luckily it's dropping but there's more work to do. It's a shame that no Democrat is serious on illegals (Hillary mentioned it a few weeks ago but her voting record proves her soft on illegals). I hate to do this but at least Paul and Tancredo are anti-illegal. Until the government seriously worries about this, I'm fighting the duopoly and won't listen to those negative smear ads because they really turn me off. I consider myself a moderate libertarian in ideology and like many of the Libertarian Party's platforms (although I prefer a moderate and gradual change for Libertarianism). The Democrats could still have my support when I vote but I want to look for a change. The other day I had a dream where a third party unity ticket won the majority of electoral votes and therefore the Presidency. Do you know what the headlines were? " 2008, the year Americans screamed for real change". In 2006, I've voted 3rd party for many candidates and I'm willing to continue to vote 3rd party. It might not mean much now but if we want to see a third party or 2 bloom and we change our electoral system, we must all unite and wait till third parties rise. I personally think that 08 will be like the 92 election and we have to really look at our candidates.
2007-02-24 19:00:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. Evil is evil and this two party with bought and sold elections is evil.
If this is the case I'll just have to vote on a few primary issues important to me and not the Country as a whole because neither of the candidates will have a real answer to anything important.
Our votes mean nothing evil or more evil is the only choice we have.
2007-02-24 22:26:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely.
Our elections are like the South Park episode where we have to choose between the Giant Douche and the Turd Sandwich.
Unfortunately, the Turd Sandwich "won" the last two elections. Personally, I would have preferred the Giant Douches.
2007-02-24 16:29:19 · answer #4 · answered by chimpus_incompetus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! Unfortunately the people who would make really great Presidents are also smart enough not to throw themselves into the mess, they know they'd never really get anything done since everyone in Washington cares more about a partisan agenda than about what will actually help this country.
2007-02-24 16:27:58 · answer #5 · answered by Hamlette 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I thought I was the only one voting that way. Turns out the lesser of the two was probably the worst thing to do...
2007-02-24 16:27:22 · answer #6 · answered by mean evil woman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should select our leaders at random, out of a stack of phone books, at least we would get people that are honest enough to get pass the phone companies checks. It would be like the DRAFT, you sign up when your 18 and the come get you when they need you, only this time your chances of not getting killed are higher. The political bribery folks would never get caught up and might just disappear...'magine dat!
2007-02-25 01:55:40 · answer #7 · answered by Michael S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh, dear God YES! I would love to see a debate where both candidates told you why THEY were the best choice rather than picking away at their opponents record and history. people only resort to attacking others when they have nothing of their own to put on the table.
2007-02-24 16:29:09 · answer #8 · answered by Alan S 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, because they are only two people that suck up enough to be president. In all actuality, presidents are just figureheads for a certain agenda.
2007-02-24 16:43:50 · answer #9 · answered by the_amazing_dude 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
True Dat
2007-02-24 16:29:09 · answer #10 · answered by ScottyDoesntKnow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋