why did Elizabeth Shue take the place of "Jennifer" in "Back to the Future - part 2"?

Question

I forgot the name of the first girl to play Jennifer in part 1, but why did they replace her with Elizabeth Shue in part 2? I like the girl in Part 1 better. That's not saying that Elizabeth Shue is a not a good actress. She's a great actress. I just like the look of the first Jennifer.

Answer 1

because the original jennifer's (claudia wells) mother had been diagnosed with cancer and stopped acting until about 1996, and hasn't acted much since. Also, Crispin Glover did not appear in any of the other back to the future's simply because he did not want to.

Answer 2

Yes, I did too----Elizabeth Shue is also too tall for Michael J. Fox, and looked too mature next to him.
The actress in the first BACK TO THE FUTURE that played his girlfriend, and looked just right with him----- IRL got into real trouble with drugs and alcohol. She may have quit films at that point. It's a shame, because she was really cute.

Answer 3

the only thank you to look after your self from those issues is to seek extra advantageous than basically the bible. historical manuscripts provide us information on how the bible became what it fairly is and from the place those recommendations originated. case in point, the only reason we communicate of devil is by way of the fact the bible relates that to us yet in certainty he would not exist yet is the personification of a theory of existence. the belief gained floor in the 14th century whilst Jerome got here up with the Latin Vulgate which became the authorized "bible" for all learn and examining. It replaced into he who desperate to insert the call of Lucifer in Isaiah and over the years the myths and fables of Christians twisted it right into a real creature, a scapegoat in certainty, that has not extra credence than the guy in the moon. there is a lot extra. case in point Jehovah is one among seven gods that make up the Elohim stated in Genesis. Comparative theology is a key, a good device to diminish by way of those dogmas. A lazy individual won't in any respect see it and could be incredibly led via the blind..