English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-24 13:48:17 · 4 answers · asked by kelly b 2 in News & Events Current Events

4 answers

Counter-terrorism or counterterrorism refers to the practices, tactics, techniques, and strategies that governments, militaries, and other groups adopt in order to fight terrorism. Counterterrorism is not specific to any one field or organization; rather, it involves entities from all levels of society. For instance, businesses have security plans and sometimes share commercial data with the government. Local police, firefighters, and emergency medical personnel (often called "first responders") have plans for dealing with terrorist attacks. Armies conduct combat operations against terrorists, often using special forces. Building a counterterrorism plan involves all segments of a society or many government agencies. Because propaganda and indoctrination lie at the core of terrorism, understanding their profile and functions increases the ability to counter terrorism more effectively.

Today, many countries have special units designated to handle terrorist threats. Besides various security agencies, there are elite tactical units whose role is to directly engage terrorists and prevent terrorist attacks. Such units perform both in preventive actions, hostage rescue and responding to on-going attacks.

These units are specially trained and equipped for CQB with emphasis on stealth and performing the mission with minimal casualties. The units include take-over force (assault teams), snipers, EOD experts, dog handlers and intelligence officers.

Examples include United States Marine Corps Force Recon, British, Australian and New Zealand SAS regiments, Israeli YAMAM, American Police SWAT teams, Canadian JTF-2 and the German Police GSG 9. However, it is rare that military units such as the Israeli Sayeret Matkal, German KSK, the U.S. Navy's DEVGRU or the U.S. Army's Delta Force actually engage in counter-terrorism operations, as they are largely prevented by either jurisdiction or laws like the Posse Comitatus Act from operating in their own country.

Thus, the majority of counterterrorism operations at the tactical level, are conducted by state, federal and national law enforcement agencies or intelligence agencies, such as the FBI, MI5 [1], Scotland Yard SO15[2],the ATF, or the Mossad. Obviously, for countries whose military are legally permitted to conduct police operations, this is a non-issue, and such counter-terrorism operations are conducted by their military.

The majority of counterterrorism operations actually take place at the intelligence level, through the use of covert surveillance (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), satellite intelligence (GEOINT or SATINT), and electronic intelligence (ELINT). According to the U.S. Army's anti-terrorism level 1 training brief, the majority of terrorist cells are exposed during their surveillance attempts as it is the only time they are visible. By the time they carry out the actual operation, it is usually too late.

Some famous counterterrorist actions of the 20th century include the Entebbe raid by Israel, the response to the Achille Lauro hijacking, the Munich Olympics hostage rescue attempt and subsequent assassinations, the Iranian embassy siege and the Battle of Mogadishu.

The concept of anti-terrorism emerges from a thorough examining of the concept of terrorism as well as an attempt to understand and articulate what constitutes terrorism in Western terms. Anti-terrorism was bound to emerge as the stakes for a concise definition of terrorism are raised. Unlike counterterrorism, the prefix "anti-" suggests a diplomatic and less confrontational line than counterterrorism. Like its mirror terminology, it is a broad term, though it is invoked far less often.

Since the September 11, 2001 attacks, leaders in Western nations have emphasized the importance of living a full life with no undue fear, burden, no less valor. This is commonly posited as an average citizen's way to help "defeat terrorism". Prescription of such reactive behavior has faded from the public discourse in more recent years. In the United States, the Department of Homeland Security was created and the War on Terrorism has shifted to diplomatic and other fronts like Iraq. There had been numerous cases made for the abuse of the term Anti-terrorism as a general umbrella under which cause is formulated to stifle civil liberties and dissipate dissent.

Understanding the roots of terrorism is an important new field of study, with sub-specialties emerging. For example, the noted profiler Katherine VanderKaay explores "Girls Interrupted: The Making of the Female Palestinian Suicide Bombers" in "Terror in the Holy Land," published by Praeger Press, 2006, edited by Judy Kuriansky. Bruce E. Wexler, MD of Yale says of the book, "To promote peace you must understand the human hearts and minds...[this book] powerfully deepens and broadens our understanding... There is no other book like it."

In the wake of the London bombings of 7 July and 21 July 2005, the term has been used to describe legislative measures in both the United Kingdom and Australia which extend unprecedented powers to law enforcement. Such powers facilitate more aggressive methods of detainment and investigation of persons suspected of terrorism.

The legislation in Australia allows police to detain suspects for up to two weeks without charge, and to electronically track suspects for up to a year. In both countries, with entrenched liberal democratic traditions, the measures have been controversial and have been criticised by civil libertarians and Islamic groups.

2007-02-24 14:10:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First we could understand what they are offering. they are basically offering the nuclear gas for means sector. Why are they offering. they are in choose of money. India can survive with out nuclear means. Then we could discover different means to fulfill the means hollow. there should not be any substantial replace in India. The coverage is to be unfavourable whether it rather is powerful or undesirable.

2016-11-25 21:39:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No idea ask Homer Simpson

2017-01-12 00:06:27 · answer #3 · answered by Gothicmiku 1 · 0 0

not giving into fear
refusing to be afraid
not casting stones nor striking back
stoic restraint of the urge to pannic

refusing to blame the other guy
not getting out of your seat because of fear
not generating panic
not generating fears

its turning the other cheek for god
its seeing good in all things
its knowing there is good and bad in all of us
its seeing hat isd and not making it worse

its knowing the greater force dosnt win the other simlpy choses not to explain to god why you killed that he created ,and sees that dying is not that bad but killing is 100 tinmes worse ,its about having faith when every bone in your body screams revenge

its about standing alone when all else is choosing to join sides

2007-02-24 14:42:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Globally when I position myself I find a dangerous terrorist in me.

2016-01-26 01:52:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

homeland security.

2007-02-25 14:42:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i thought it was painfully obvious....

2007-02-24 16:00:31 · answer #7 · answered by Sam 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers