2007-02-24 13:42:30 · 7 answers · asked by (S.O.B)Sorry old boy 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Depends really on how the songs are sampled, but .wav files are always going to be larger. I would say on average about 3 times larger than .mp3 files of the same song.
2007-02-24 13:50:10 · answer #1 · answered by Captain Rob 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a wav file is like a higher quality mp3, a mp3 is a newer version of a wave file and is smaller formated so you can store more songs without taking up as much space.
2007-02-24 21:51:26 · answer #2 · answered by Tim3219 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A wav file can take up to ten times the space of an mp3. But if you're burning to a CD, a wav is better. If you edit an mp3 and save it as an mp3, you can get noticeable deterioration of sound quality.
2007-02-24 21:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by Dr Know It All 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A wav file takes up 3-4X more space
2007-02-24 21:45:33 · answer #4 · answered by Krazi3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wave for sure is larger. Mp3 is a compressed wave file usually.
2007-02-24 21:45:13 · answer #5 · answered by bob K 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
mp3
2007-02-24 21:44:52 · answer #6 · answered by Nikki Valentine 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
.wav file of course.
2007-02-24 21:45:49 · answer #7 · answered by misterb_1972 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋