There's something seriously wrong with your equation.
The proper equation, assuming that you're using earth's gravity, is:
y=104t-16.1t^2
differentiate w.r.t.
dy/dt = v = 104 -32.2t
now just plug in t=4 to get v(t=4). Notice that at t=0, velocity is that intial velocity. Note also the signs.
2007-02-24 13:11:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by modulo_function 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1) The position of the ball as a function of time is given as y(t) = k * t^2; k = 104 - 16 = 88
2) The velocity of the ball, @ t, equals dy/dt = 2kt
3) The velocity of the ball @ t=0, is zero; however, this contradicts the given 104 value -- The problem is improperly defined!!
4) Note that everything is nice if y(t) = 104t - 16t^2. In this case the correct answer is d)
2007-02-24 13:30:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by 1988_Escort 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ur Eqn is WRONG
It must be y = 104t - 16 t^2
But it is not a necessary one.
Now apply this formula
v = u + gt
= 104 + (- 32)x 4 Where g = -32 , it is against the gravity
= 104 - 128
= -24 ft/s
2007-02-24 15:16:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by brainy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let height = h
h = 104t^2 - 16t^2
= 88t^2 feet
Let initial velocity = u
u = 104ft/s
t = 4,
So, h = 88 * (4)^2
= 88*16
= 1408 feet
Let final velocity = V
Let acceleration be a
h = ut + 1/2 at^2
1408 = 104*4 + (1/2 * a * 16)
1408 = 416 + 8a
416 + 8a = 1408
8a = 1408 - 416
a = 992/8
a = 124 ft/s^2
Now, V^2 = 2ah + u^2
V^2 = 2*124*1408 + (104)^2
= 349184 + 10816
= 360000
V = 600 ft/s
2007-02-24 13:18:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Akilesh - Internet Undertaker 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
No sweat, just a typo,
y = 104t - 16t^2 (Gen form is y = y0 - 0.5gt^2)
Differentiate to obtain speed
v = v0 - gt
= 104 - 32*4
= -24 f/s
2007-02-24 13:24:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by RWPOW 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Let v = u - gt
Let s = ut - (1/2) g t²
s = 104t - 16t²--------(where s is distance)
ds/dt = 104 - 32t = v-----(where v is velocity)
v = 104 - 4 x 32------(after 4 seconds)
v = 104 - 128
v = - 24 ft / s-----------ANSWER d)
2007-02-24 22:35:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Como 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
As x techniques 2 from the valuable or unfavorable area? It rather does make a distinction. If from the unfavorable, the numerator would be an relatively small neg. quantity and denominator an relatively small neg. quantity and because x^3 will reason the numerator to approach 0 quicker than (x-2) will, the shrink will approach 0. From the valuable, numerator will replace right into a vey small valuable and denominator an relatively small valuable yet, the effect would be an identical because of the fact the neg.. The shrink will back approach 0.
2016-10-01 22:32:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the equation given in the problem looks wrong.
2007-02-24 13:06:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by jason 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That doesn't make any sense to me & I am pretty good at both physics and math...Did you forget a variable somewhere?
2007-02-24 13:09:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ivhie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋