I listed 13 deeds of Clinton, with newspaper, and date reference. I want everyone to understand the free speech of liberals means stopping you from reading that list. What are they afraid of?
2007-02-24 12:30:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hmm-- I said I have publications & dates for my points.
Don't like old stuff dredged up- So Bush AWOL is off limits, his cocaine, his air force service, WMDs, 2000 election, 2004, Prescott Bush being a Nazi- that is never discussed?
2007-02-24 12:38:37 · update #1
Tokoloshi... decides what is "crap" and should not be seen. Bush being a chimp, I suppose, is scientific, so passes the muster.
2007-02-24 12:41:30 · update #2
Its altar boy not alter boy- and no.
2007-02-24 12:43:46 · update #3
thenextJF.. I would respect you if you supported that in all cases. Take a survey of liberal questions here- how many are serious? Look now- there's one: "What s george bush s favorite food?"
answer is bananas etc. I see that this meet your high bar of responsible debate.
2007-02-24 12:47:40 · update #4
Free speech to liberals? How many socialist countries do you know of with free speech?
Lenin and Stalin were both very supportive of it in the Gulag.
2007-02-24 12:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The list goes like this 1. Signed the Family Leave Act to help families care for their sick and elderly. 2. Protected public lands. 3. Balanced the budget. 4. Created the first surplus in 40 years. 5. Triangulated the Republican Congress into knots. 6. Worked 16 hour days and didn't take a vacation every two weeks. 7. Broke the string of Republican spokesmodel Presidents to save the Democratic legacy. 8. Helped bring peace and prosperity to Ireland. 9. Built a new Democratic Party by giving young people like Rahm Emmanuel increased responsibilities. 10. Peace to Kosovo. 11. Worked with the UN to foster world stability. 12. Increased Student Aid for college. 13. Welfare Reform. 14. Brought race relations to a new understanding. 15. Did his job!
2007-02-24 21:04:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Afraid? Not of much. However, many liberals *are* sick of people dredging up unsubstantiated accusations and smear tactics from over six years ago. How about seeing what we can do about the President we've got now?
And no, I didn't read your previous question or get it deleted. I've just seen so many of its ilk that I suspect I know the gist of it.
You've still got free speech, really. Go blog about it.
2007-02-24 20:35:57 · answer #3 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The yahoos at Yahoo delete anything that is bad for the far-left.
2007-02-24 21:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by Adi 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why did it say it was deleted?
some of the reasons it gives are silly, if you ask me... but some have a point... if you violate the rules, you pay the price... but I think that there should be some leeway inside the rules too... some people are kind of annoying with that...
2007-02-24 21:11:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
While I didn't see your earlier question, it doesn't sound like there was much of a question. Was it simply a political statement, couched as a question and designed to attack those on the other side? If so, then I think it should have been deleted.
2007-02-24 20:43:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
What is the fascination with Clinton? He has been out off office for six years. I understand that things are bad right now and you may want him to come back, but I am sorry to tell you that is not possible. The good news is his wife is running for President.....dick..sorry, I thought your name was Richard.
2007-02-24 20:42:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Clinton was the first president to play saxophone on TV.
Clinton was the first president that a Republican Congress forbade the attack of AlQuieda in retaliation for their assault on a US Embassy
Clinton was the first President that in the middle of a Cruise Missile attack on AlQuieda training camps a Republican Congress said we do not authorize that attack.
Go big Red Go
2007-02-24 20:41:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Don't blame yahoo. It was probably some whimpy cry baby conservative or neocon that reported you. Yahoo doesn't bother or have the time to read them, they just act up on reports. Just re-post it.
About Bush:
http://www.realchange.org/bushjr.htm
.
2007-02-24 20:47:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I saw your 'supposed' list, (pure fabrication) and this might be the first time I agree with the 'powers-that-be' at Yahoo.
'Freedom of Speech' doesn't mean you can invent a lot of crap, and demand that everybody read it.
Get it, Sonny?
2007-02-24 20:38:02 · answer #10 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋