Boston Redsoxs showed Interest in him last year or so..
http://www.abc.net.au/sport/content/200504/s1339706.htm
I think he should, cause in cricket players start degrading after they hit 35..cause stamina and endurance is Huge Key in Cricket, but in Baseball where not much Stamina or Endurance is required, and u can practically play till ur 50, several e.g, John Franco, Clemens, David Wells..
even though gilchrist is not the best Cricketer, he can still do some damage, i reckon he wont be a power hitter because of his size but he can play for average.
2007-02-24 11:10:34 · 7 answers · asked by tino67 3 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I very much don't think so. I can't see him taking drugs!!
2007-02-25 11:11:09 · answer #1 · answered by barnz_nut 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i seriously doubt he will, i can't think of any major cricket player that has ever done it or had a serious thought about doing it.
Would be interesting to see some of the cricket stars play a game or 2 though!
2007-02-24 13:04:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I consider Scotty Mack approximately Adam's properly suited innings being his century v England final 365 days in Perth. desirable innings i've got ever seen. organic champion. he would be ignored, yet i'm effective his kinfolk will relish seeing extra of him..
2016-10-16 10:14:39 · answer #3 · answered by dickirson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Jordon tried his hand in baseball and failed. I think Gilchrist will do better if he chooses to play baseball.
2007-02-24 15:59:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No he won't because he now has a new child and when he retires he will want to spend more time with his family
2007-02-24 12:24:46 · answer #5 · answered by Sport head 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is upto his fitness and willingness. What can I say.
2007-02-26 16:27:17 · answer #6 · answered by fairy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2007-02-25 00:13:53 · answer #7 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋