English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How much faster do you think the yz250f is compared to the wr 250

is the wr250 a good, strong bike?
heard of any problems with it?

2007-02-24 11:08:53 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation Motorcycles

6 answers

Normally, an enduro bike will be tuned a little differently (due to valve timing/overlap/duration, flywheel weight, carburetor size & jetting, etc.) even when its engine is based on that of a motocross relatives.

So a WR should have a little more torque and a little less horsepower than the YZ, BUT its transmission, like other competition enduro bikes, is a wide ratio one (hence the WR designation in the case of Yamaha enduro bikes) with higher overall gearing that should produce a higher top speed than the YZ...

It's also worth noting that some enduro bikes that are closely related to a motocross family member may have a extra cog in their transmission (the YZ450 had a four speed transmission in 2003 - 2005, not getting a five speed until 2006, while the WR450 had a five speed box all along).

Also remember that the YZ (or any motocross bike) is about hard hitting power so that you can exit a turn AND then build enough speed on a short piece of track to clear a double or triple jump. Enduro bikes have a slightly relaxed power delivery that makes them easier to ride in longer events than a typical motocross heat.

I have a 2002 WR426 which has been rock solid for me...

Although I have no direct experience with a WR250, most of the above should hold true for it when compared with a YZ250F.

2007-02-24 15:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by xmachina7 2 · 0 0

It is probably the most reliable 250F woods bike out there, even though I ride a Honda. The WR is a de-tuned YZF and is heavier. You would see a noticeable difference in performance if you rode the two back to back. If you are riding in the woods that is not a bad thing though and the push button is so nice to have in the woods.

2007-02-27 07:51:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Th WR is a good bike. The YZF is faster and lighter, but it also less reliable and not as trail friendly. I would recommend a WR250f to anybody who is intermediate and under 185lbs or so. After 185lbs, you might be pushing it on a 250 four stroke and should move up to the 450.

2007-02-25 06:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by atvman_400 5 · 0 0

The WR is an enduro bike so should be slightly slower but more reliable as it does more miles between services. It should also have a lighting kit on it ( or provision to fit one) he generators are different.

2007-02-24 11:17:21 · answer #4 · answered by 1crazypj 5 · 0 0

the only major differnce between the WR and YZ is the gear ratio's in the transmission, the WR is a trail bike and the YZ is set up for racing, but both are great bikes!

2007-03-03 12:37:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ryan B 1 · 0 0

Wr250f Top Speed

2016-10-16 06:27:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers