is Saha man u quality?

Question

Is it time for fergie to sell saha? he's clearly no van nistelrooy. His first touch is often poor, and is just not clinical enough for me in front of goal. Seems to need 3 chances to score 1 goal, where as van nistelrooy was a much more incisive finisher. will he improve and come good? or should be be sold and fergie look to sign a true word class striker that any top team needs? shame drogba is at chelsea, he'd be ideal for united i think.

Answer 1

I agree that Saha may be Premier League quality but not Man United quality. I didn't see why Man U paid so much for him from Fulham when he was only ok there.

A team like Manchester United should have the scouting system in place to find their next goalscorer. Maybe keeping Saha as a squad player would be ok for competition for places but I don't think he should be a first choice for the team.

Maybe Man United should have paid £8 million for Andy Johnson, he's English and scoring goals for a mid table team....just think what he could do with Giggs and Ronaldo supplying the crosses!!!!!

Answer 2

He's a faster player than Van Nistelrooy but when it comes to his job your right, he may not do it right. But even still, I think even though he may not be Man Utd class he's a good player and when he's on form he really is on form so I don't know really- but Fergie is a class manager so if he's keeping him he must see something in Saha we don't.

Answer 3

Have you watched Saha play lately? You're definately right he is no van Nistelrooy. I believe that if Saha's play doesn't get better by the end of the season, Man U should sell him while he is still as overrated as he is, and try to find a better striker.

Answer 4

I always thought Louis Saha was OK, BUT, just recently he has not been playing very well, I do not think anybody thought he was any better than Ruud Van Nistlerooy, It was at time a fact that Saha was playing better than Van Nistlerooy was. Which is why he (Ruud) had his hissie fit.

Answer 5

Saha has missed a hell of a lot of football in recent years, but before he joined Man Utd he was on fire - yes they paid a lot of money for him, but like any good player, you need to be playing regular football to get to your best. Look at Forlan - he was never given a chance, but showed glimpses of what he can do.

Answer 6

well the team with van nistelrooy was all revolved around him.....with saha, the whole team scores....wel not all but deffo more than last season and before tht

Answer 7

In my opinion: saha is not as good as ruud,but has some potentional to try an at leats score...you can't compare van nistalroy with saha, ruud is way way way way better, saha is kinda immature.......

Answer 8

I do believe he's a good player but not a Man U quality... He cares more about scoring which is shooting at bad position and that results by wasting balls.

I do understand he's been hired to score goals but for me as long as you make the team win that's what counts. What I don't like about him is his shooting he doesn't care how he's positioned but Nistelroy didn't force to score.

Thanx!

Answer 9

yes he is good enough saha is a team player while rvn played for himself
selfish pig
no wonder we are actually winning

Answer 10

i disagree with you, the number of start Rudd got for united saha isn't even close ti it, how do you expert him to be rude.he's not getting the amount of start that Rudd got during his Carree at united.