Are the Libs proud now that their elected leaders have bought into Al Qaeda's victory strategy?

Answer 1

the libs did not start this war and I resent them always getting accused of the carnage over there.
They are trying to stop it not keep it going.
They do not make Al Qaeda's victory strategy? Bush did that all by himself.

Answer 2

Al Qaeda's victory strategy, huh? One track minds with no sense of personal constraint are getting more intricate now, aren't they?

Stop being a tool! If we were really going to win this war, we'd have done it by now. It was more strategic flaws made by American military and diplomacy that handed our @sses over to the 'enemy' than political dissidence wrought from sensible observations about the state of our union and the progress of this brand new war.
When you power the village mill with sh*t the water's always brown. The more people like YOU keep being bullheaded about the views of your particular political affiliation instead of worrying about the longevity of the country you claim to love the more you contribute to the problem you try to blame on everybody else! Unity is the real key here, b/c we don't need to be all in their pudding just to keep them from operating. Pull your head out of your @ss and realize that everyone who keeps encouraging the internal conflict is hurting America, and they're doing even more to make this so-called 'victory strategy' come true. Way to hurt your own cause! Cut off your nose to spite your face and see how well your eyes will function when they're full of blood and tears, ya frickin' moron!

Answer 3

No we are amazed that elected leader Bush fell into the trap set by Islamic radicals by invading Iraq. That sure got us into a mess, eh? They are glad he didn't pursue Osama in Afghanistan and let him get clean away. They're rejoicing at 4 years of blood and death, which they revel in, being spread in Iraq and being uncontainable. They are happy the world, which embraced the USA after 9/11 has given up on its leadership. And they are thankful Bush has provided a wonderful training ground for them.

OBL and Al Qaeda love George Bush.

Answer 4

What victory strategy would that be? We took the heat off Al Qaida when we went after Saddam and took the heat off of Bin Laden. Now they can sit back, build up weapon cache's and support (which isn't too hard since our bogus attack on Iraq has probably fostered even more anti-american sentiment than before in that region) send combatants over to Iraq to tie us up there and keep us from hitting them at the heart of their operations. They aren't stupid, they know the bind we are in with Iraq, and we have a president that has repeatedly not made the right decisions to clean up this mess. Bush didn't send enough troops even though every single general recommended it (he thought we would be greeted as liberators), he has set no specific objectives for us to acheive in Iraq except "victory" (which he already claimed we had accomplished), the country is in shambles and now we are tied up for years over there fixing the mess that we started. I think Al Qaida's victory was when we stopped hunting them down 4 years ago and entered Iraq, which has absolutely nothing to do with Al Qaida. In this instance, the president's total mishandling of the Iraq war is our own worst enemy.

Answer 5

Is anybody home? I bumped into this little IED on the net: The Muslim Brotherhood 'The Project'. This has sites on 'The Project', which is the currect strategy these radicals are engaging in a planned list of steps to infiltrate our govt & culture. I challenge all to decide for yourselves. Please give it a look.

Answer 6

Thank your president bush for giving Iraq to them. Saddam Hussein was a mean s.o.b. but he did suppress Al Qaeda. With him dead, Iraq's oil goes either to bush's friends, the sunnis (thats Saudi Arabia and Al Qaeda) or the Shi'ites (thats Iran and they hate our guts and are allied with China and Russia). So whatever problems you have with the middle east is your guy's fault. Liberals had NOTHING to do with creating the problem, it was ALL YOUR "President". And thanks for your question. Have a nice day.

Answer 7

When I voted, there was Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent and Green Party on the ballot.

There was no liberal. So how could you possibly blame the liberals if they are not in charge?

How does this even make sense to you? There are liberal Republicans and liberal Democrats.

Answer 8

They are absolutely deaf to this fact - they are totally incapable of of seeing anything past their own idealistic goals of a complete and total retreat.
I have personally asked people who buy into these policies, which DO embolden the enemy, and they look at me like I'm absolutely bonkers. They really don't have a clue - they truly think that the only way to support the troops is to cut and run. They do not believe the war on terror is anything we should be involved in and they damned sure don't think the Islamic terrorists' ideology and threats are worth anything we should be concerned with.
It's reality vs. idealism, security vs. fantasy and don't waste your breath with facts or history lessons - they are right, and you are wrong. Period.

Answer 9

im very proud that bush has set up the largest terrorist traing camp in the middle east,way to go george!!!

Answer 10

If you don't like it, blame Bush. Nobody made him invade Iraq and turn the whole world against him.