No, I would not vote for Gore for the 3 main reasons:
1 - He has become known extensively as an environmentalist, which is fantastic. I am grateful for him bringing environmental concerns to the forefront of the media. My issue is that he was instrumental in moving the U.S. away from the Kyoto talks during his vice-presidency term, which is inconsistent with his current stance on the environment. On this issue, check this site http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367 and see what a bigot he has become, with his residence in Nashille consuming 20 times more energy than the national average.
2 - He already ran and lost to a president that has not been impressive in any positive way. Precedent would suggest that he would also loose to candidates on the same level or better than the one he lost to - and I hope the next president is better than the current one.
3 - The Dem party has some great names running, and I don't think Gore would rank as a leading candidate in that party right now. Thus far I like B. Obama, but even without him the Dems have great names in the running.
2007-02-24 08:23:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell confident. He became an substantial area of the Clinton Presidency and has extra adventure than any candidate interior the race. He additionally has come down from the mountain with a view to communicate after thinking he had gained the Presidency and then having it taken away. So he's waiting. additionally, all aspects of the Democratic coalition can help Gore, Conservative, center and liberal, or maybe many noticeably liberal democrats might get at the back of Gore. He can get the nomination in 2 techniques. Win it outright on the Democratic convention with the aid of working and gathering delegates or he could be drafted if no person wins the 1st pollat the convention. Gore could be the excellent coalition candidate around. deliver him a digital mail and ask him to run. thank you for the question.
2016-11-25 21:09:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Back when the 2000 election began I was cheering for Bush. After the whole recount BS I found myself not being able to trust him. I have to admit I was never a fan of Gore in the day and it wasn't necessarily him I was rooting for after it all, I just wasn't pleased with the way the recount was handled. Gore kept his cool and I respected that. Since then he's basically disappeared and since An Inconvenient Truth and the sucess it's had I'm very pleased. I'm big on stopping global warming and I believe it to be a big factor in today's society. I think that Al Gore has reinvented himself as of recently and I have to say that there is a big appeal I have to it. So ultimately yes, I would vote for Gore in 2008. I think he would do a great job and an honorable job. It's going to be rough for anybody who has to take over for Bush. I think he would be a better candidate than Obama. As for Hilary, I have to say I think she would do good, but I think that the fact that she is a woman (no offense) is ultimately going to hurt her in the end I believe. With the way other countries place woman on the lower end of society they would look at us and probably disrespect us more. Hope that makes some sense.
2007-02-27 17:22:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by MrKidneySton3d 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, ABSOFUCKINLUTLEY! I would be proud to vote for a president who cares about global warming as well as a man that Obviously did not lose the 2000 election but stepped aside for the United States.
You are a hero my friend! I will Vote for you and so will most Americans who are tired of the tyranical BS GW has given us!
God Speed SIR!
2007-02-25 13:53:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He had his chance.During his campaign he shoved Clinton off to the side while capitalizing on the popularity of him.
His campaign sucked big time and if it hadn't been for Clintons popularity would never have received so many votes. He is a dullard left best to saving the enviroment.
2007-02-24 07:43:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I voted for him last time and would do it again. Incidentally, he is my second choice after Hillary. I would vote for Hillary over Gore, but for Gore over anybody else.
2007-02-24 09:58:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds wierd to some of you, but yes and I woulfd vote for Gore if they were running against each other, then I would vote for gore/
2007-02-24 07:38:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by ProLife Liberal 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Right now, I don't care which democrat it is! A bag of rocks could do a better job than Pres. Bush!
2007-02-24 09:22:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cardinals = Greatness 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes id vote for al gore to be deported...wait what was the question again?
2007-02-24 07:35:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
AL GORE??????
HA! HE DOESN'T HAVE WHAT IT TAKES, BESIDES WE DONT NEED ANY DEMOCRATS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY!
NO I WOULD NOT VOTE FOR HIM OR ANY OTHER DEMOCRAT!
2007-02-24 07:57:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by True American 4
·
1⤊
1⤋