Didn't we make osama bin laden mad during Bush Sr.'s presidency when we based troops in the Muslim sacred land of Saudi Arabia? And then they say Bush Jr. is actually doing something about Muslim extremism, yet our borders are still not safe? Seriously, if illegal immigrants can still get in, what makes one think another terrorist attack is impossible.
2007-02-24 07:04:56 · 6 answers · asked by Lemon juice 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Republics never take responsibility for their failures, so they just point their finger at President Clinton.
2007-02-24 07:38:58 · answer #1 · answered by Peter Pumpkin Eater 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
When the Clinton's where in office there where such drastic cutbacks on the FBI, CIA and the Military that he basically made them ineffective and 911 is one of the results you have from it today. One example is shutting down the black bag ops in the Military where as they where knocking off terrorists since the 1980's
2007-02-24 16:08:28 · answer #2 · answered by kato outdoors 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Making them mad is only an excuse some people use to blame America, truth is they want world domination for their religion and we are standing in their way.
2007-02-24 22:41:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As the plan, preparation and starting implementation was done during Slick Willy's reign...you tell me....GW was in office less than a full 9 mo. when it happened
2007-02-24 15:49:40 · answer #4 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Same can be asked how many years they investigated his sex life while in office.
Such a great party with so many great minds there, uhmm??
2007-02-24 20:24:02 · answer #5 · answered by Sir W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
CLINTON HAD SEVERAL CHANCES TO GET UBL BUT DIDN'T.
THE SUDANESE WERE GOING TO HAND HIM OVER BUT CLINTON REFUSED SAYING THAT THE SUDANESE GOVERNMENT WAS CRIMINAL. HE HAD A CHANCE TO GET HIM IN AFGHANISTAN BUT DIDN'T SINCE THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT COLLATERAL DAMAGE.
2007-02-24 16:03:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋