2007-02-24 06:44:39 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It is a consenting adult snake.
2007-02-24 06:46:10 · update #1
They're in LOVE and it doesn't hurt anyone.
2007-02-24 06:54:22 · update #2
Good question, cuz. But the liberals do not understand the slippery slope argument. They are too engaged in idealistic, linear feeling-controlled non-logic.
Personally, I feel that wrong is wrong, whatever name you want to tag on it.
2007-02-24 07:05:30 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 3⤊ 11⤋
Okay, I have heard and can understand the valid points of both sides of the argument. I can somewhat see how either side, whether the individuals who maintain such convictions are directly impacted by it or not, can view it like that. What I can't grasp is how opinionated fools, who have no idea what the hell they're saying but like feeling the wind between their teeth can feel justified by making outlandish statements like this that they think support the idea they think they understand. Regardless of the fact that you're an idiot, how can you possibly convince yourself that this load of sh*t you just spewed forth is actually a valid intelligent remark. Intelligence and intellectual capacity can always be spotted and contrary to popular belief is actually quite simple to pick apart and reconstruct so you can get a better understanding of the motivations within the mind that possesses that intellect. But the inner workings of idiocy is a bit more complex. What is the driving force, how exactly is the symbiotic mechanism between incompetence and egotism fueled? And what level of encouragement and what kind, is needed for the moron to continue doing what he or she does? This is more difficult to determine, because intellect is such a solid definitive thing, but idiocy is variable, and unstable. In fact one might argue that such instability is the very nature of idiocy, the fact that nothing substantial can be ground in. I would be quite obliged if you could help me along in these studies, you would perhaps be a picture perfect specimen, if you will, for my own social experiment observing idiots and their idiosyncrasies and trying to find a common denominator which can be used dissect the mind of other idiots using a common method that can be just as well plotted as the method for picking apart the intelligent introspective mind, and coming up with results that are just as clear cut. Please consider this offer, I would be much obliged have a nice day!
2007-02-24 10:07:28 · answer #2 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in my opinion, i trust that the bible ought to haven't to any extent further some thing to do with how guidelines are made. lots of the beliefs are an similar, sure, yet on effortless degrees. there's a seperation of church and state it really is being crossed and trampled. no longer to tutor the very truth, for sure, that marriage interior the former testomony is particularly loose. positive, it really is between a guy and a lady in there, yet there is also the daughter, the slaves, or perhaps the siblings. yet bigotry runs deep in both faith and regulation, so it takes a lengthy time period to get transformations done. this isn't conserving tha faith is a nasty element, yet i do no longer trust the bible, or the different non secular textual content must be taken so actually.
2016-12-04 21:41:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1- people said the same thing with interracial marriage in '78
2-if you think animals and people can consent and love each other in the same way- not only are you a fool but you are an insult to all humans (and to some animals who are much smarter)
3-how does gay marriage hurt you?
explain this to me and I'll actually listen to you and treat you like a semi-intellegent human being
2007-02-24 09:00:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I apologies if I offend you by saying this, but that is the most bigoted comparison I have ever heard. You are a comparing a gay man to an animal! Regardless of his sexual orientation and how you feel about such, he is still a man, a human being, and you don't even have the common decency to respect him as such? It's people like you that make me ashamed to be an American sometimes...
2007-02-24 08:09:46 · answer #5 · answered by number_nine08 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
In an attempt to include other possible biases, shouldn't you have specified a black snake a white snake or the one offering the forbidden fruit ?
2007-02-24 11:05:26 · answer #6 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is the most ASSININE thing I've heard in a long time. And that is saying a lot! Any human should be allowed to marry any other human. I do not want to discriminate and be prejudiced, even though conservatives do that already. But no one will be allowed to marry animals, no one would want to anyway.
2007-02-24 07:04:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Wow! And here I've been thinking that gay people only wanted to marry other gay people. Thanks for letting me know they also want to marry snakes too! They must be stopped cause next they'll be wanting to marry salamanders, or god forbid, newts!
2007-02-24 07:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by drea376 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would feel the same as an Evangelical Christian in the backwoods of Arkansas wanting to marry his sister, or mama.
2007-02-24 07:20:24 · answer #9 · answered by harry m 1 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hey whatever floats his boat, he can marry his goldfish for all I care. I do draw the line at live shaved declawed gerbils though...
2007-02-24 06:57:00 · answer #10 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 8⤊ 2⤋
The same way I will feel when you marry a pet snake.
Who cares, just don't do it in my living room.
2007-02-24 06:50:35 · answer #11 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 7⤊ 3⤋