1986? It's 21 years old and it's high perfomance with a sports engine which means the drivers of the vehicle probable drove it in the ground. It's to be expected of a race car.
2007-02-24 07:12:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by SmartyPants 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
For the 2009 year, I'd say M6. I am not a big fan of the M3 in 2009. But I prefer the M3 in the 2010 year. Interesting review below at this website
2016-05-24 06:27:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
These were fairly short-lived engines. I would generally stay away from all M cars from the 1980s unless it is a pristine low mileage car owned by a BMW nut, and even then I'd spend $150 and have a BMW specialist go through it stem to stern.
2007-02-25 12:18:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you choose not to communicate in proper English, then I hope your repair bills exceed your meager income.
You sir should be driving a Chevy Cavilier.
You do not deserve to drive a BMW
2007-02-24 11:33:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oil quality was poor in the 80s. A load of engines seized up from poor oil quality. It was mineral oil and created sludge in the engines of higher performance cars. In the 90s they made higher performing synthetic oil.
However you've not really given any detail... could be many things... cambelt, coils.. who knows.
2007-02-24 06:30:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe Bloggs 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Unless you discribe the nature of the problem your quries can never be answered. Write down the details of the problem of when,where and how?
2007-02-25 02:48:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
these people talk rot - mine still runs fine - starts on the button - and still good for 145mph with 5 people on board and she's got 106000 mls these engines were made for revvin'
2007-02-26 07:32:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Found that left hand drive was the biggest problem dude, stick to your mini.
2007-02-24 06:40:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋