a non athletic, a athletic?

Question

for a 7 footer in the nba, would you rather be

player A
has 3 point shot 45% , can handle the ball, has a 26" vertical, not really good defense, not really a good rebounder, has midrange game, is an average passer, good free thrower, not a shot blocker, has average post up game, more of a halfcourt game

player B
36" vertical, range 0-21 feet, averages 10+ rebounds per game, 30ppg, a good shot blocker, good defense, good freethrower, can handle the ball, average passer, a fast break player, a finisher, likes to dunk

Answer 1

i don't need 7-footers to be good shooters, of course it's nice, but that should be an added bonus to someone who can dominate on the interior on both sides of the basketball...give me player B! he's the ultimate big man

Answer 2

Player B all of the way. I would rather have a better all around game than being just a good 3-point shooter. Plus, he could play for the Suns if he was a good runner and finisher.

Answer 3

player B
at 7ft i'm assuminf i'm a PF or a C and player "B" has better defence and rebounds but can still handle the ball and shoot freethrows. player A dosnt seem to have much going for him compared to player B, exept maybe 3 poitners, and that job can go to the gaurds.

Answer 4

this question is automatic player B. there is absolutely no argument for player A. player B can play defense, has tremendous hops, shoot freethrows, get rebounds, lots of points, pass the ball, dunker. and player A, are you kidding me? he shoots the 3, yeah. but look at everything else...no defense, no rebounds, no blocking skills.

PLAYER B. NO DOUBT.

Answer 5

Player B
you completely stacked it for him
i would rather be an all around than a 3 point shooter
also Player B is fast
and who doesn't like dunks

Answer 6

I'm just gonna take a stab at who these players are: Player A: Mehmet Okur
Player B: Marcus Camby

Just a thought.

Either way, I'll take player B.

Answer 7

duh!!!!! B is so much bettter that was a stupid question