English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When Bush was not able to catch Osama (person responsible for 9/11) for 6 years still.

http://www.buzzflash.com/perspectives/Clinton_and_Terrorism.html

2007-02-24 05:24:10 · 10 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

When Bush and his bunch ignored the briefing which said "Osama bin Laden plans to hijack planes" , they lost their credibility in blaming anyone else for this disaster. They also demoted Richard Clark who was practically screaming that the terrorists were about to attack (demoted because he worked for Clinton earlier).

2007-02-24 05:29:40 · answer #1 · answered by ignoramus 7 · 1 4

Clinton had 8 years to catch Osama, you expect Bush to do better?

Clinton had two opportunities to take out Osama but he was too busy with golf. (Dereliction of Duty. It is a book, you have to read it.).

Clinton treated terrorism as a crime. He was more concerned about arrests and convictions than about PREVENTING future attacks. He ordered the FBI not to share information with local agencies for fear that the sharing the information would compromise the prosecution of any acts of terrorism that came up.

Lastly, Clinton used the military to wag the dog. Check out the timing of his Monica testimony and the attacks on an empty camp in Afghanistan and an aspirin factory in the Sudan. The only time he used the military to defend someone was to defend the Muslims in Kosovo from the Christians in Serbia.

2007-02-24 13:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by forgivebutdonotforget911 6 · 0 0

It's not a false accusation, and if you paid any attention to history, you'd know that.

The most important point is all about Billybob forcing Israel to let Mohammed Atta go free. Terrorist pilot Mohammed Atta blew up a bus in Israel in 1986. The Israelis captured, tried and imprisoned him. As part of the Oslo agreement with the Palestinians in 1993, Israel had to agree to release so-called "political prisoners". However, the Israelis would not release any with blood on their hands. The American President at the time, Bill Clinton, and his Secretary of State, Warren Christopher, "insisted" that all prisoners be released. Thus Mohammed Atta was freed and eventually thanked the US by flying an airplane into Tower One of the World Trade Center. This was reported by many of the American TV networks at the time that the terrorists were first identified. It was censored in the US from all later reports. Why shouldn't Americans know the real truth?

2007-02-24 05:28:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

No one falsely accuses Clinton of anything, they speak of the fact that he did absolutely nothing when Osama first attempted a terrorist attack on the Towers in 93, not to mention all that followed... Had he acted like a responsible President, perhaps maybe 9/11 wouldnt be a devestating part of History..

2007-02-24 05:29:40 · answer #4 · answered by Katz 6 · 2 2

Bush tried to catch him nut not able since Pres. Clinton ignores his activities so that he can strengthen his force without any intervention! Remember, Pres. Clinton policy focus on internal problems rather than deal with international affairs! His administration thought that if US didn't interfere in the other countries, we will be spared! Everything turns out wrong!

2007-02-24 05:48:01 · answer #5 · answered by holyfire 4 · 2 0

Clinton had 8 years and did nothing.

2007-02-24 05:39:58 · answer #6 · answered by earl justice 3 · 3 0

Cause clinton had 6 or 7 terrorist attacks on his watch and did nothing about it.

2007-02-24 05:28:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

sure,i think of.there replace into this previous female on P&S some months in the past,Helga Bones.She replace right into a spammer, and anybody stored telling she replace right into a troll too,yet i think of she certainly by no skill stated each and every person... And so some distance as i comprehend,noone accused me of being a troll.i don't rfile each and every person,so what variety of troll am I??

2016-10-16 09:46:23 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Yes, but it is a known fact that Clinton could have killed Osama and didn't pull the trigger.

2007-02-24 05:27:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Clinot could have caught Osama, destroyed Al-Q, and beaten the ideology of hate when it was rather young. His failure has let terrorism grown into a power of its own.

2007-02-24 05:41:38 · answer #10 · answered by United States 2 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers