Isn't ironic diverse, they don't want to see guys, but then they come to us. So there actions contradict what they say. They say they are physically attracted to men or sexually attractred to me, yet women are more attractive aesthetically. I must not know all the definitions of attraction, because isn't someone that is physically attractive, good looking, thus physical appearance, looks, visual, aetshetics? I thought attractive things are what draws someone to it and it looks good, well I thought straight women were drawn to men, and not just of the personality, smile, other attributes, but the physical appearance as well. I thought looks and attraction were subjective, but it seems quite universal. Unless it is all emotional/chemical for women to men or just attributes, which is too bad, and what seems to defy the laws of sexual attraction that I thought there was, which a part of it is physical attraction/appearance.
2007-02-24 06:18:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brennan Huff 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't quite understand the question, I think the half-naked men to half-naked women ratio in most films is actually in a womans favour. This is much an extension of the "Nipple Equality" question a few pages back.
A woman may show her breasts in, perhaps, 5 minutes of a film, during some sexually charged scene. Men can, and do, spend several minutes in a fight scene or equivalent beating the crap out of each other with no shirts.
If you are refering to full frontal nudity, I think I've ever seen a FF of a woman in a single film (Devils Advocate), and male FFN in 28 days later.
2007-02-24 18:16:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are plenty of movies of muscular men taking off their shirts. Or "handsome" men in chick flicks. I don't know what you're talking about.
Also, most women don't even buy Playgirl magazines or anything similar, because society brainwashes women into thinking such acts are wrong, and that sex is considered demeaning and taboo. It seems most women state that they'd rather look at other naked women, which is plentiful in the movies and magazines. I wish more women will appreciate men sexually, but I fault society's slanted focus on mainly the beauty of women.
2007-02-24 13:53:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure I really understand the Q.
To me, there isn't enough "eye candy" full stop, because what I like is not liked by enough other women for it to be commercially viable. Therefore, I rarely get to see men I like physically even in mainstream films.
Oh well ... that is what my imagination is for, I guess.
2007-02-24 21:47:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Girl Machine 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Thank you for finally saying it, birdlady. Now if only you could speak with the filmmaking idiots in Hollywood about it... Hm....
2007-02-24 15:13:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lomar M 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because women aren't as perverted as guys.
2007-02-25 03:50:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by wistful_dolphin 2
·
0⤊
3⤋