English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And can u explain what were salients actually with respect to this question

2007-02-24 05:00:19 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

3 answers

The best chance for German success in the East was to avoid attacking cities and prepared defensive positions. The Wehrmacht was very skilled at using flexible maneuver to bypass the enemy's strongpoints, mass at the critical place and time, and punch through the enemy's defenses to reach an objective or surround an enemy force and defeat it in detail....the use of pincers as you call it, were the armoured formations used as pincers like a crab...surrounding the enemy and pinching them.

Salients are adequately described above....a 'bulge' in the line was the salient. The most notable on the eastern front, of course was the Kursk salient. The Russians also had a salient at Stalingrad, a bulge across the Volga into the German line.

2007-02-24 07:08:12 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0 0

first make a break true the enemy line with infantry artillery and air support. Then send true the gaps mobile forces ( panzer divisions ans there supporting units ) and give them close air support ( stuka ) then they have to occupy all the major crossroads, bridges and city's so that the enemy is serious limited in his freedom to move. This mobile forces has to be relieved as quickly as possible by the less mobile infantry units so you can use them to block any attempt to from the enemy to escape of the pincer.
To create a pincer assault the above described process is being don on at least 2 different places and the 2 mobile forces will meet somewhere behind the enemy's back

salient is a part of the front line that sticks into the front line of the enemy classic example Kursk . A salient is mostly a place that is easier to defend ( woods, a hill , or a city )

2007-02-24 05:43:48 · answer #2 · answered by general De Witte 5 · 0 0

while the German generals have been allowed to deal with the troops, it became rather useful. The Germans' maximum suitable tactic became to permit the Soviets to interrupt by using their lines, then enable them to pour in men and machines to attempt to exploit the breach. as quickly as the pink military became overcommitted, the Germans might unharness the reserves and chop up the Soviet forces. a sturdy occasion of this became the 2nd conflict of Kharkov in early 1943, the place the Germans finally stopped the Soviet Stalingrad offensive. the project that the Germans had became that they had an atrocious "standard" named Adolf Hitler who usually overruled his generals and refused to permit strategic withdrawals until eventually it became too previous due. Germany lost an entire military group interior the summertime of 1944--approximately 500,000 men--by way of fact of Hitler's stubbornness. If the army group have been allowed to deal with the troops, there's a very sturdy threat that they could have stalemated the Soviets in the previous they have been given to Germany, or a minimum of killed a great variety of Russians that Stalin might have concluded that it wasn't nicely worth occurring. below those situations, there is each reason to have self assurance that Stalin might have negotiated a treaty based on the 1941 frontiers.

2016-09-29 13:41:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers